Momentum and energy of rebounding balls

AI Thread Summary
When a tennis ball bounces off a wall, it reverses its momentum from p to -p, resulting in a change of momentum of 2p. Despite this change, the kinetic energy of the ball remains constant in a perfectly elastic collision because its speed does not change, only its direction does. The wall experiences an impulse equal to the change in momentum of the ball, which is double the ball's initial momentum. In a closed system, total momentum is conserved, meaning the wall and Earth gain an equal amount of momentum, but their massive size results in an imperceptible change in velocity. This explanation clarifies the relationship between momentum and kinetic energy during the rebound.
d-richard
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Greetings,
I was thinking about bouncing a tennis ball against a wall and how its momentum and kinetic energy would change. I asked a friend of mine and he answered that the ball would transfer more forward momentum than it had to the wall but its kinetic energy would remain constant. How is that possible? I know that the ball will strike the wall with momentum p and and bounce back with a momentum -p ignoring any forces (including gravity) that affect my ball-wall system. The energy should be conserved as the wall is assumed to be frictionless. How is it then, that the ball rebounds off the wall by transferring more momentum than it had? I assumed that this is a closed system, so therefore this should be an elastic collision. Am I wrong in doing so? And if so, how does the momentum actually reverse direction? Thanks for any answers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ball strikes the wall with forward momentum p_forward = mv.

Assuming a perfect ball, it bounces backward with momentum p_backward = -mv.

The change in momentum is (p_forward - p_backward) = (mv) - (-mv) = 2*mv.

Hence the impulse felt by the wall is double the momentum of the ball. But if the bounce is perfect, the speed is unchanged - thus the kinetic energy of the ball is unchanged: only the direction changes.

For imperfect balls, walls, and bounces you get something less for both.

PS: the ball reverses direction because it is _elastic_.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks a lot. Makes a lot more sense
 
Also, total momentum of the Earth and ball and wall is conserved. The ball has gained -2P momentum, and the Earth and wall will gain 2P momentum (since the wall is firmly stuck in the earth). say the mass of Earth and wall is ##M_E + M_W## this will be of the order of 10^24 kg, and the momentum 2P will be of the order of 10 kg m/s So the velocity of the Earth and wall, which results from the transfer of momentum will be of the order of 10^(-24) m/s In other words, you just wouldn't notice it.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I see. Very useful. Thanks
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top