Momentum and Kinetic Energy: A Fundamental Relationship?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between momentum and kinetic energy, exploring their mathematical connections and historical context. Participants examine the derivation of kinetic energy from work done and its relation to momentum, as well as implications in physics, such as conservation laws and collision scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that kinetic energy (KE) can be derived from the work done on an object, which is related to the force exerted over a distance.
  • Others explain that force is the rate of change of momentum, leading to the integration of momentum with respect to velocity to derive the kinetic energy formula.
  • A participant questions the integration process that leads to the expression for kinetic energy, specifically regarding the use of the chain rule and the treatment of derivatives.
  • Another participant references the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to clarify the integration process involved in deriving kinetic energy from momentum.
  • Some participants mention historical figures like Leibniz, Descartes, and Newton in relation to the development of concepts of kinetic energy and momentum.
  • One participant introduces the concept of Lagrangian mechanics and its relation to momentum and the principle of least action.
  • A participant asks about a potential third integral related to kinetic energy, specifically questioning if there is a formula involving 1/3mv^3.
  • Another participant provides practical insights into the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy in collisions, highlighting the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the integration process and the implications of momentum and kinetic energy in physics. There is no consensus on the historical precedence of the concepts or the existence of a third integral related to kinetic energy.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the definitions of kinetic energy and momentum, as well as the conditions under which they are conserved. The integration steps and their interpretations remain a point of contention.

Pseudo Statistic
Messages
391
Reaction score
6
Probably dumb question asked before...
How are Momentum and Kinetic Energy related?
I've noticed P = mv and KE = 0.5mv^2 indicating that KE is just taking the integral of momentum with respect to velocity, is that a coincidence or is there a reason for such a relation?
Which discovery came about first?
Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ForceBoy
Physics news on Phys.org
Not dumb at all. The object that has kinetic energy got it from having work done on it--that is, a force exerted over a distance.

KE = Work Done = \int F dx

The force is just the rate of change of momentum: F = ma = m dv/dt. Put this into the integral to get

KE = \int m \ \frac{dv}{dt} \ dx

Now use the chain rule to write dv/dt = (dv/dx)(dx/dt) = v (dv/dx):

KE = \int m v \ \frac{dv}{dx} \ dx = \frac{1}{2} m v^2

This is equivalent, like you pointed out, to just integrating p=mv with respect to v.

edit: I'm not sure which formula came first. I would think the formulas originated about the same time, but I really don't know. The concepts were known before Newton, but I think he made them precise.
 
Last edited:
PBRMEASAP said:
Not dumb at all. The object that has kinetic energy got it from having work done on it--that is, a force exerted over a distance.

KE = Work Done = \int F dx

The force is just the rate of change of momentum: F = ma = m dv/dt. Put this into the integral to get

KE = \int m \ \frac{dv}{dt} \ dx

Now use the chain rule to write dv/dt = (dv/dx)(dx/dt) = v (dv/dx):

KE = \int m v \ \frac{dv}{dx} \ dx = \frac{1}{2} m v^2

This is equivalent, like you pointed out, to just integrating p=mv with respect to v.

edit: I'm not sure which formula came first. I would think the formulas originated about the same time, but I really don't know. The concepts were known before Newton, but I think he made them precise.
What I don't understand is this bit:
"Now use the chain rule to write dv/dt = (dv/dx)(dx/dt) = v (dv/dx):

KE = \int m v \ \frac{dv}{dx} \ dx = \frac{1}{2} m v^2"
How'd you get 1/2mv^2 after integrating mv dv/dx with respect to x? If you did the integral of mv you get 1/2mv^2... but I'm kinda tripped up with the dv/dx.
Care to explain?
Thanks.
 
Because of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, that integration reverses differentiation and vice versa, plus the linearity of integration, you can pretend the dv/dx is really a quotient and cancel the dx's.
 
Right. The easiest way to see it is by working backwards from the answer. For example, the chain rule for derivatives gives us

\frac{d}{dx} (\frac{1}{2} v^2) = v \frac{dv}{dx}

and the fundamental theorem of calculus says

\int \ \frac{d}{dx} (\frac{1}{2} v^2) \ dx = \frac{1}{2} v^2

We can use the first equation to see that

\int \ v \frac{dv}{dx} \ dx = \frac{1}{2} v^2


edit: took out some stray parentheses
 
Last edited:
As for the history of the concepts of KE & momentum,i think u'll find interesting discussions in bigraphies of G.W.Leibniz,R.Descartes & I.Newton.

Daniel.
 
OK, I get it.
Thanks.
 
whats the third integral? rate of change of KE?
 
What about considering Lagrangian? For principle of least action (with Lagrangian function) to hold, partial derivative of it must be momentum, so that action can be minimized using Newton's Law.
 
  • #10
dont know what that means
 
  • #11
This is Lagrangian mechanics.
 
  • #12
so there is no third integral? nothing with the formula 1/3mv^3?
 
  • #13
How are Momentum and Kinetic Energy related?

Some practical insights here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_linear_momentum#Conservation_of_linear_momentum

Momentum has the special property that, in a closed system, it is always conserved, even in collisions and separations caused by explosive forces. Kinetic energy, on the other hand, is not conserved in collisions if they are inelastic. Since momentum is conserved it can be used to calculate an unknown velocity following a collision or a separation if all the other masses and velocities are known.

A common problem in physics that requires the use of this fact is the collision of two particles. Since momentum is always conserved, the sum of the momenta before the collision must equal the sum of the momenta after the collision.

Determining the final velocities from the initial velocities (and vice versa) depend on the type of collision. There are two types of collisions that conserve momentum: elastic collisions, which also conserve kinetic energy, and inelastic collisions, which do not.
 
  • #14
Necropost alert.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
9K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K