Momentum and Position Operator Commutator Levi Civita Form

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the commutation relation ##[L_i,x_j]=i\hbar \epsilon_{ijk}x_k##, where ##L_i## represents angular momentum operators defined as ##L_i=\epsilon_{ijk}x_j p_k##. The participants emphasize the importance of the Levi-Civita symbol in this context, noting that the equation holds true under specific index conditions. The conversation highlights the necessity of understanding the summation convention and the implications of differential operators in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically angular momentum operators.
  • Familiarity with the Levi-Civita symbol and its properties.
  • Knowledge of commutation relations and their significance in quantum theory.
  • Basic proficiency in differential operators and their application in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of the Levi-Civita symbol in physics.
  • Learn about the derivation and implications of angular momentum in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the use of differential operators in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to momentum.
  • Investigate the summation convention and its role in simplifying complex equations in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, angular momentum, and mathematical physics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of commutation relations and their applications in quantum theory.

PatsyTy
Messages
30
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Prove that ##[L_i,x_j]=i\hbar \epsilon_{ijk}x_k \quad (i, j, k = 1, 2, 3)## where ##L_1=L_x##, ##L_2=L_y## and ##L_3=L_z## and ##x_1=x##, ##x_2=y## and ##x_3=z##.

Homework Equations



There aren't any given except those in the problem, however I assume we use

$$L_i=x_jp_k-p_kx_j$$

$$[A,B]=AB-BA$$

$$[A+B,C]=[A,C]+[B,C]$$

$$[AB,C]=[A,C]B+A[B,C]$$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]

Sub ##L_i=x_jp_k-p_kx_j## into ##[L_i,x_j]##

$$[x_j-p_k-p_kx_j]=[x_jp_k,x_j]-[p_kx_j,x_j]$$

Use ##[AB,C]=[A,C]B+A[B,C]##

$$([x_j,x_j]p_k+x_j[p_k,x_j])-([p_k,x_j]x_j+[x_j,x_j]p_k)$$

The two commutators ##[x_j,x_j]=0## so I end up with

$$x_j[p_k,x_j]-[p_k,x_j]x_j$$

However I have no idea where to go from here. I don't understand where the ##x_k## term comes from. I assume the ##i\hbar## term would appear if I wrote the momentum operators as ##-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x_k}## however then I would end up with a bunch of differential operators I don't know how to work with.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PatsyTy said:
I would end up with a bunch of differential operators I don't know how to work with.
Easy: ##{\partial \over \partial x_i }x_j = \delta_{ij}##
 
PatsyTy said:

Homework Statement


Prove that ##[L_i,x_j]=i\hbar \epsilon_{ijk}x_k \quad (i, j, k = 1, 2, 3)## where ##L_1=L_x##, ##L_2=L_y## and ##L_3=L_z## and ##x_1=x##, ##x_2=y## and ##x_3=z##.

Homework Equations



There aren't any given except those in the problem, however I assume we use

$$L_i=x_jp_k-p_kx_j$$

This last equation is not correct. It is only true if the indices are ##(i, j, k) = (1, 2, 3), (2, 3, 1)## or ##(3, 1, 2)##. For example:
$$L_1 = x_2 p_3 - x_3 p_2$$
This is where the Levi-Civita symbol comes in:
$$L_i = \epsilon_{ijk}x_j p_k$$
Because, if ##i = 1## say, then ##\epsilon_{ijk} =0## except ##\epsilon_{123} =1## and ##\epsilon_{132} =-1##

And note that this invokes the "summation convention", which is a convenient shorthand and hides a whole bunch of the mathematical framework. For example, written out fully that would be:
$$For \ i = 1, 2, 3: \ \ L_i = \sum_{j,k = 1}^{3} \epsilon_{ijk}x_j p_k$$
That is three separate equations (one for each of ##i = 1, 2, 3##) involving ##L_i## equal to a sum of 9 terms.

My advice is that, until you have really mastered this Levi-Civita symbol, you should always keep in mind that it is an extreme shorthand and often what appears to one equation involving a couple of terms is in fact much more complicated.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K