What is the physical meaning of the commutator of L^2 and x_i?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat1z
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the computation of the commutator of the angular momentum squared operator, L^2, with the components of the position vector, x_i. Participants explore the implications of this commutator in the context of quantum mechanics, particularly regarding the measurement of physical quantities.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to compute the commutator and questions its physical significance beyond the non-commutativity. Other participants discuss the implications of commutators in terms of simultaneous measurability and eigenstates.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the correctness of the original poster's approach and engage in a deeper exploration of what the values of commutators signify in quantum mechanics. There is an ongoing dialogue about the nature of measurements and the relationship between commutators and physical observables.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of non-zero commutators in the context of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the conditions for simultaneous measurements of observables.

mat1z
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Task: The task is to compute the commutator of L^2 with all components of the r-vector. It seems to be an unusual task for I was unable to find it in any book.

Known stuff: I know that [L_i,x_j]=i \hbar \epsilon_{ijk} x_k (\epsilon_{ijk} being the Levi-Civita symbol). Now I would go about as follows (summation implied):

My attempt: [L^2,x_j]=[L_iL_i,x_j]=L_i[L_i,x_j]+[L_i,x_j]L_i=i \hbar \epsilon_{ijk} (L_i x_k + x_k L_i)

Question: Is this correct? Is there a physical meaning to this result other than that they do not commute (with the usual implications)?

Regards, Matti from Germany
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's correct.

When two operators commute their eigenvectors coincide. In quantum mechanics it means that the corresponding physical magnitudes can be measured simultaneously.
 
Alright, thanks for the reply.

So, does that mean that the only real information contained in commutators as such (and not their application, as in constructing angular momentum eigenstates) is in it being zero or not? It's clear to me that zero commutators imply instantaneous measurability but I thought maybe there was something to be seen from the "value" that the commutator takes...
 
mat1z said:
Alright, thanks for the reply.

So, does that mean that the only real information contained in commutators as such (and not their application, as in constructing angular momentum eigenstates) is in it being zero or not? It's clear to me that zero commutators imply instantaneous measurability but I thought maybe there was something to be seen from the "value" that the commutator takes...

Not instantaneous measurements, but simultaneous diagonalization--you will be able to find eigenstates of both A and B if [A,B]=0.
Having a non-zero commutators means the observables cannot be simultaneously known (cf. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle).
 
jdwood983 said:
Not instantaneous measurements, but simultaneous diagonalization--you will be able to find eigenstates of both A and B if [A,B]=0.
Having a non-zero commutators means the observables cannot be simultaneously known (cf. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle).

Sorry, simultaneous measurements is what I was trying to say, of course. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K