Momentum and wave vector representation

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
p=\hbar k
So ##dp=\hbar dk##
How to define Fourier transform from momentum to coordinate space and from wave vector to coordinate space? I'm confused. Is there one way to do it or more equivalent ways?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I know, the only way to do it that preserves normalization is:

$$\psi(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi \hbar}} \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty} {\phi(p) e^{ipx/\hbar} dp} \\ \phi(p) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi \hbar}} \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty} {\psi(x) e^{-ipx/\hbar} dx}$$

or

$$\psi(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty} {A(k) e^{ikx} dk} \\ A(k) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty} {\psi(x) e^{-ikx} dx}$$
 
Thanks for your answer. And when you want to go from momentum to wave vector representation
For example
##\psi(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}F(k)e^{ikx}dk##
##p=\hbar k## so ##dp=\hbar dk##
and
##\psi(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\frac{1}{\hbar}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}F(p)e^{i\frac{p}{\hbar}x}dp##
Right?
 
LagrangeEuler said:
##\psi(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\frac{1}{\hbar}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}F(p)e^{i\frac{p}{\hbar}x}dp##

You will find that, using this equation, if F(p) is normalized, that is

$$\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty} {F^*F dp} = 1$$

then ##\psi(x)## is not, that is

$$\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty} {\psi^*\psi dx} \ne 1$$

whereas for my version (in the first pair of my previous post), if ##\phi(p)## is normalized, then so is ##\psi(x)##, and vice versa. The extra factor of ##\sqrt{\hbar}## makes the difference. In my version,

$$\phi(p) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\hbar}} A(k) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\hbar}} A \left( \frac{p}{\hbar} \right)$$

(Your F(k) is my A(k).)
 
But why? Why is ##\phi(p)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\hbar}}A(k)##?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top