MHB Momentum Change in Hockey Ball: Mass 0.2kg, Speed 8m/s to 5m/s

AI Thread Summary
A hockey ball with a mass of 0.2 kg is initially traveling at 8 m/s before being hit, resulting in a change in momentum when its speed is reduced to 5 m/s after being intercepted. The ball's acceleration is defined as a = -0.5 - kt, and after 2 seconds, it has traveled 41/3 meters. To find the change in momentum, the velocity at t=2 seconds must be calculated using integration, leading to the equation v(t) = -0.5t - (kt^2)/2 + 8. The momentum change is determined by applying the formula Δp = m[-5 - v(2)], confirming that the magnitude of the momentum change is 2 Ns.
Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
A hockey ball of mass 0.2kg is hit so that its initial speed is 8 m/s. The ball travels in a horizontal straight line with acceleration given by a= - 0.5- kt where t is the time in seconds measured from when the ball was hit. After 2s the ball has traveled 41/3 m. It is then intercepted by a players from the other team. This player hits the ball so that its direction of travel is reversed and its speed is now 5 m/s. Show that when the ball is hit by the second player it's momentum changes in magnitude by 2 Ns
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Integrate the above expression to get velocity at t=2 sec and then apply $m(-5 ) - m(v_{t=2})$ assuming ball is traveling in positive x- direction initially.
 
DaalChawal said:
Integrate the above expression to get velocity at t=2 sec and then apply $m(-5 ) - m(v_{t=2})$ assuming ball is traveling in positive x- direction initially.
So after integrate I get v= -0.5t- kt^2/2 +c
When t=0, v= 8m/s
So v= -0.5t -kt^2/2+8
 
DaalChawal said:
Integrate the above expression to get velocity at t=2 sec and then apply $m(-5 ) - m(v_{t=2})$ assuming ball is traveling in positive x- direction initially.
I don't understand how to calculate after this
 
$v(t) = -0.5t - \dfrac{kt^2}{2} + 8$

$\displaystyle \int_0^2 v(t) \, dt = \dfrac{41}{3}$

evaluate the integral, solve for $k$, then determine the value of $v(2)$

$\Delta \vec{p} = m[-5 - v(2)]$
 
skeeter said:
$v(t) = -0.5t - \dfrac{kt^2}{2} + 8$

$\displaystyle \int_0^2 v(t) \, dt = \dfrac{41}{3}$

evaluate the integral, solve for $k$, then determine the value of $v(2)$

$\Delta \vec{p} = m[-5 - v(2)]$
Thank you very much!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top