Momentum cutoffs free field theory

thoughtgaze
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
for a given diagram in some interacting theory that needs a momentum cutoff

shouldn't the same momentum cutoff be used for diagrams that don't need a momentum cutoff for convergence

for example, phi3 theory has a self energy diagram that diverges, so if one imposed a momentum cutoff there, shouldn't there also be one for the tree level diagram for consistency?

Shouldn't it also be imposed on the free part of the lagrangian too?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, remember that in the end we always take the limit as the momentum cutoff goes to infinity. For divergent diagrams this limit is nontrivial and defining and evaluating this limit is the whole point of renormalization. But for convergent diagrams this limit is trivial and is equal to what you would get if you just evaluated them without a momentum cutoff.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top