What is the energy loss of a solid sphere hitting a wall obliquely?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physmurf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Momentum
physmurf
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
So, I am reading about a compton scattering problem, and I don't understand part of the derivation of a formula. I will explain my confusion.

If a gamma photon with energy E_{\gamma}, undergoes compton scattering with an electron which is at rest, how does one arrive at the following expression?

E^{'}_{\gamma}=\frac{E_{\gamma}}{1+(2E_{\gamma}/m_{o}c^{2})}

So far it says we start with the conservation of energy and momentum:
E_{\gamma}=E^{'}_{\gamma}+E_{e} \ \ (eqn 1)
\frac{E_{\gamma}}c=P_{e}-\frac{E^{'}_{\gamma}}{c}\ \ (eqn 2)

From eqn 2 we get:
E_{\gamma}+E^{'}_{\gamma}=p_{e}c=\sqrt{(E_{e}+m_{o}c^{2})^{2}-(m_{o}c^{2})^{2}}

This is where I am confused. I don't understand where the term inside of the radical comes from. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physmurf said:
E_{\gamma}+E^{'}_{\gamma}=p_{e}c=\sqrt{(E_{e}+m_{o}c^{2})^{2}-(m_{o}c^{2})^{2}}

The E_e in the square root on the right is the electron's kinetic energy, which most books call K_e. E_e usually means the total energy:

E_e = K_e + m_0 c^2

Using this notation, the relationship between energy, momentum and mass is

E^2 = (pc)^2 + (m_0 c^2)^2

so

p_e c = \sqrt {E_e^2 - (m_0 c^2)^2} = \sqrt {(K_e + m_0 c^2)^2 - (m_0 c^2)^2}
 
Last edited:
hi all,

a similar post for me. pls help me.
i need to calculate the energy lost by a solid sphere (~ 0.5 mm dia) on hitting the solid wall obliquely.
i know the tangetial and normal velocities and the restitution coefficients. what other parameters do i need to know ??

help with the expression or a reference to articles in the web would be of great help.

thanks you.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top