Momentum Formulae: Inertia & P=m*v

  • Thread starter Thread starter rahaverhma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulae Momentum
AI Thread Summary
Momentum is defined as P = m*v, where momentum (P) is the product of mass (m) and velocity (v), both treated as vectors. The equation P = E/c applies specifically to photons, which have zero rest mass but possess momentum due to their energy. In relativistic mechanics, the inertial mass of a photon can be expressed as m = E/c^2, leading to the conclusion that |p| = E/c when the speed of light (v = c) is considered. Conservation of momentum necessitates that light carries momentum, as demonstrated by phenomena like radiation pressure in space. It is crucial to use invariant mass in relativity, as photons have an invariant mass of zero.
rahaverhma
Messages
73
Reaction score
1
I know that P=m*v but I saw that
Momentum (p) =E/c how can we say this
We need to have inertia to call the momentum
of entity. Plzz solve this dilemma
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation of momentum requires that light have momentum. This can be seen in things like the radiation pressure on an object in space. If we didn't assign momentum to light then there would be a violation of the conservation of momentum law.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
When you say P=m*v you mean that the momentum P is mass multiplied by velocity, both them are vectors and m is the inertial mass (different than the rest mass in relativistic mechanics).

On the other hand |p| = E/c is a equation that only applies to photons, photons have zero rest mass but the inertial mass is m = E/c^2 and since v=c this leads to

|p| = m * c = E / c
 
Not again please! It is really good advice not to use any other notion of mass in relativity than invariant mass, and the invariant mass of photons is 0 and nothing else. ##E/c^2## is just the energy divided by ##c^2##. In natural units you have ##c=1## anyway, because in relativity there's no reason to use different units for space and time or energies and momenta.
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top