Momentum Operator w/ Dirac Delta Potential: Justification

  • Thread starter Thread starter hokhani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Operator
hokhani
Messages
556
Reaction score
17
Consider a particle in one dimention. there is a dirac delta potential such as V=-a delat(x). The wave functions in two sides(left and right) are Aexp(kx) and Aexp(-kx) respectively. So if the momentum operator acts on the wave functions, would give two complex numbers while the momentum operator is Hermitian. what is the justification here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To see it more clearly, step away from the delta function for a moment and consider instead a finite square well potential, V(x) = -V0 for |x| < a and zero otherwise. Assuming the well is deep enough to have a bound state, the ground state wavefunction will be sinusoidal within the well and exponential without. Inside the well the kinetic energy p2/2m is positive and p is real. But outside the well is a classically forbidden region where the kinetic energy is negative and p is imaginary.

This is perfectly consistent with p being Hermitian, because the thing that must be real is not p itself, it's the matrix element or expectation value ∫ψ*pψ dx
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top