Momentum transport in gases in 2d

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding momentum transport in two-dimensional gas systems, particularly questioning the assumption that half of the gas molecules move in the positive y-direction and half in the negative. The author highlights that if the gas mass is static, it raises the question of why there is an equal distribution of velocities. It is noted that while the average speed of all particles can be zero, individual particles still exhibit motion in both directions. The conversation also touches on the need for resources that explain momentum transport in 2D without relying on tensors. Overall, the complexities of analyzing momentum transport in static versus accelerating gas masses are emphasized.
Mohankpvk
Messages
102
Reaction score
3
I was trying to understand the momentum transport between gas molecules in 2d.In the image below, it is stated that half of the molecules move up(positive velocity in y direction) and half negative.But the author didnt explain why he assumed it.
IMG_20180914_172950.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180914_172950.jpeg
    IMG_20180914_172950.jpeg
    52.3 KB · Views: 660
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the whole gas mass is assumed to be static, not moving up, down, left, right.

You could do a different analysis for an upward accelerating gas mass, such as on a rocket, but the answers would change.
 
  • Like
Likes Mohankpvk
anorlunda said:
Because the whole gas mass is assumed to be static, not moving up, down, left, right.

You could do a different analysis for an upward accelerating gas mass, such as on a rocket, but the answers would change.
But why half if the gas is static?Please explain.I referred a few books for momentum transport but all of them used tensors.Is there any book(or other source) in which transport is explained only in 2d?
 
Mohankpvk said:
But why half if the gas is static?

No, all the particles are moving, some + some -, the average speed of all is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes Mohankpvk
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top