More fundamental and more difficult

  • Thread starter Thread starter redgoat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fundamental
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison between professional engineering work and theoretical research regarding their fundamental roles and difficulties in solving real-life problems. Professional engineering is highlighted for its direct application to real-world issues, requiring a blend of scientific principles, technical knowledge, and problem-solving skills, all while navigating constraints like cost and safety. In contrast, theoretical research is recognized for its critical role in driving discoveries and advancing understanding, though it often involves greater challenges such as securing funding and navigating academic politics. Both fields are deemed equally fundamental and difficult, with engineering focusing on practical applications and theoretical research providing the groundwork for future innovations. Ultimately, both are essential for addressing complex societal challenges and fostering progress.
redgoat
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Which one is more fundamental or more difficult in solving real-life problems, professional engineering work or theoretical research?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fundamental in solving real life problems? Do you mean, which domain is more applicable to the "real world"? I view it like this, professional engineering certainly applies to the world more often than theoretical research. But it's theoretical research that causes any discoveries to be made all and therefore impacts the real world the most.

Now there's a big difference between the words fundamental and diffucult. I would think that theoretical research would be more diffucult. You have to maintain funding, play academic politics, naviagate post doc positions when they're 2,000 professor positions to like 20,000 post docs. In engineering, you get a job, get paid big bucks, and directly help people out.
 


Both professional engineering work and theoretical research are equally fundamental and difficult in solving real-life problems.

Professional engineering work involves applying scientific and mathematical principles to design, develop, and maintain various technological systems and products. This requires a deep understanding of the fundamental principles and their practical applications. Engineers must also consider various constraints, such as cost, safety, and environmental impact, while finding solutions to real-life problems. This can be a challenging task, requiring a combination of technical knowledge, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills.

On the other hand, theoretical research involves the study and analysis of fundamental principles to develop new theories and concepts. This requires a high level of intellectual rigor, creativity, and innovation. Theoretical research is essential in advancing our understanding of the world and finding new solutions to complex problems. However, it can be a long and arduous process, with no guarantee of practical applications or success.

In conclusion, both professional engineering work and theoretical research are fundamental and difficult in their own ways. While engineering work focuses on practical applications, theoretical research lays the foundation for future advancements. Both are crucial in solving real-life problems and contribute to the overall progress of society.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
104
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top