Are These Probability Calculations Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tronter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The probability calculations presented initially are mostly correct, but there is an error in the calculation of P(first signal but not second). The correct formula for P(A ∩ B') is P(A) - P(A ∩ B), which equals 0.1, not 0.7. Additionally, the suggestion that P(A ∩ B') should be calculated as P(A) * (1 - P(B)) assumes independence, which may not apply here. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately applying probability rules to avoid miscalculations.
tronter
Messages
183
Reaction score
1
P(\text{stop at first light signal}) = 0.4 = P(A)

P(\text{stop at second light signal}) = 0.5 = P(B)

P(\text{stop at least one of two signals}) = 0.6 = P(A \cup B)

Then P(A \cap B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A \cup B) = 0.3

P( \text{first signal but not second}) = P(A \cap B') = 1-0.3 = 0.7

P(\text{exactly one signal}) = P(A \cup B) - P(A \cap B) = P(A \Delta B) = 0.3


Are these correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are; except can you explain P(1st but not 2nd) = 0.7?
 
yeah that's incorrect. It should be P(A \cap B') = P(A) - P(A \cap B) = 0.4-0.3 = 0.1
 
tronter said:
yeah that's incorrect. It should be P(A \cap B') = P(A) - P(A \cap B) = 0.4-0.3 = 0.1
Shouldn't it be P(A \cap B') = P(A) * (1-P(B))

Assuming there independent
 
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top