MHB More statistics: counting problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of possible telephone area codes in the U.S. and Canada based on specific digit constraints. For part 1, the total number of area codes is derived from the choices for each digit: 8 options for the first digit (2-9), 2 options for the second digit (0 or 1), and 9 options for the third digit (1-9), resulting in 144 area codes. For part 2, with the first digit fixed as 4, there is 1 choice for the first digit, while the second and third digits maintain the same options as in part 1, leading to 18 area codes starting with a 4. The application of the fundamental counting principle is confirmed to be correct for both calculations. Overall, the thread emphasizes understanding the counting principle to solve combinatorial problems effectively.
crystal1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
"For years, telephone area codes in the U.S. and Canada consisted of a sequence of three digits. The first digit was an integer between 2 and 9, the second digit was either 0 or 1, and the third digit was any integer from 1 to 9.
(1) How many area codes were possible?
(2) How many area codes starting with a 4 were possible?

Again, there are no further instructions and I do not know which formula to use for this problem.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is an application of the fundamental counting principle, much like your previous problem.

For part 1), can you state how many choices there are for each of the digits, and then find the product of these numbers of choices?
 
These are my choices..
2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
0,1
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9

However, I am unsure if multiplying them all together like the last problem would work? Or if I multiply the number of choices like 8*2*9?
 
crystal said:
These are my choices..
2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
0,1
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9

However, I am unsure if multiplying them all together like the last problem would work? Or if I multiply the number of choices like 8*2*9?

Your counts and application of the fundamental counting principle are exactly right. (Yes)

How would you now do part 2)?
 
6*6?
 
crystal said:
6*6?

For part 2), the first digit must be a 4, so we only have 1 choice there, and the remaining two digits have the same choices as they did for part 1). So, how many possible area codes do we have?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top