MOSFET or Rheostat or Potentiometer pros and cons?

AI Thread Summary
When considering the control of electromagnets for levitation, the discussion highlights the choice between potentiometers, rheostats, and active current controllers. Potentiometers and rheostats are similar for DC applications, but both can lead to power loss if not managed properly. For efficiency, active current controllers are recommended, despite their added complexity and cost. The user expresses a preference for battery operation and seeks to create a variable speed motor and electromagnet controller without purchasing new equipment. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the electromagnet's specifications, such as size and field strength, to ensure effective operation.
Yitzy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Preface: I'm a chemical engineering undergraduate student but as small-time and noob electrical engineering hobbyist. I really only have minimal experience in circuitry and the like.

I want to build a series of electromagnets with a variable their strength in order to levitate an opposing circular Halbach Array up to and from a certain height. This array will be separated from the electromagnets so I don't have to worry about it "sticking" to the electromagnets when off. There will also be a guide pole through the center of the array so that it stays balanced.

What would be the different factors I should consider when using a either a potentiometer or a MOSFET or PWM or some other kind of voltage variant?
Are there other kinds of energy controllers, that I could potentially use?
How do they differ from each other?

Thank you so much in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Rheostats and potentiometers are just physically different versions of exactly the same thing and for DC current they have the same effects. If you don't care about power loss/waste in those passive current limiting elements then either one would be fine. If you would like to avoid that loss/waste at the expense of some complexity (and cost), look into active current controllers
 
  • Like
Likes Yitzy
phinds said:
Rheostats and potentiometers are just physically different versions of exactly the same thing and for DC current they have the same effects. If you don't care about power loss/waste in those passive current limiting elements then either one would be fine. If you would like to avoid that loss/waste at the expense of some complexity (and cost), look into active current controllers

Thank you for the response!

That would be perfect, but I need the device to either run on battery power or through an outlet (Battery being the preference as I don't want to deal with the craziness that is a transformer...Yet) . I also want to be able to create my own variable speed motor (and electromagnet) controller, without having to buy new active current controller.

Any tips?
 
If you don't care about reduced battery life due to the waste in a pot you have no problem. Is this something that you plan to run for extended periods?
 
Powerful electromagnets tend to need large currents. Got any more info on the electromagnet? Size? Field strength?
 
Thread 'I need a concave mirror with a focal length length of 150 feet'
I need to cut down a 3 year old dead tree from top down so tree causes no damage with small pieces falling. I need a mirror with a focal length of 150 ft. 12" diameter to 36" diameter will work good but I can't think of any easy way to build it. Nothing like this for sale on Ebay. I have a 30" Fresnel lens that I use to burn stumps it works great. Tree service wants $2000.
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top