Most Plausible Reason for Large Stable Nuclei's Extra Neutrons

  • Thread starter Thread starter Faiza
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Large stable nuclei contain more neutrons than protons primarily due to the process of beta decay, where protons decay into neutrons to maintain nuclear stability. This decay helps moderate the strong Coulomb repulsion between positively charged protons, allowing for a higher neutron-to-proton ratio in larger nuclei. While the neutron's greater mass may contribute to overall stability, it is not the main reason for the excess neutrons. The need for additional neutrons increases as more protons are added to the nucleus. Ultimately, beta decay is identified as the most plausible explanation for the presence of extra neutrons in large stable nuclei.
Faiza
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
Large stable nuclei have more neutrons than protons. Which is the most plausible reason?

a. neutrons are needed to moderate the strong Coulomb repulsion between the protons

b. the neutron is heavier than the proton and thus produces heavier nuclei

c. as protons are added to nuclei, they decay to neutrons (via beta decay) that remain in the nucleus
 
Physics news on Phys.org
b and c do not even seem to be explanation of why stable nuclei have more neutrons.
 


The most plausible reason for large stable nuclei's extra neutrons is option c - as protons are added to nuclei, they decay to neutrons (via beta decay) that remain in the nucleus. This process, known as beta decay, helps to maintain the stability of the nucleus by balancing out the repulsive forces between the positively charged protons. As more protons are added, more neutrons are needed to maintain this stability, resulting in a higher ratio of neutrons to protons in larger nuclei. Additionally, the neutron's slightly higher mass compared to the proton may contribute to the stability of these larger nuclei. However, the primary reason for the extra neutrons is likely due to the process of beta decay.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top