Motion as an illusion objection

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheNerdyBushman
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the deletion of posts regarding the concept of motion as an illusion, with a moderator emphasizing that such topics do not align with mainstream scientific literature. Participants express frustration over the censorship, questioning the rationale behind deleting discussions that challenge conventional views. The moderator maintains that the topic falls outside the realm of physics and is more philosophical in nature, which is not suitable for the forum. Some users threaten to leave the community due to this restriction, highlighting a divide between philosophical inquiry and scientific discourse. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the tension between open discussion and adherence to established scientific principles.
TheNerdyBushman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Dale said:
Let's please stop the discussion about motion as an illusion. I have deleted several of the previous posts about it and will delete all subsequent posts about it.
i don't understand. why would you delete such topics? does it not fit in your understand of the universe so you delete them? or are you so sure that the concept of the thought is wrong that you just instantly delete any mention of it? that's stupid, sorry but it is, feel free to delete my post or even ban my account if that makes you feel good, I am going else were.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheNerdyBushman said:
why would you delete such topics?
On PF all posts must be consistent with the mainstream professional scientific literature. The claim that motion is an illusion is not.

TheNerdyBushman said:
im going else were.
That is certainly your prerogative. It is also the prerogative of our community of professional scientists to avoid sites where "motion is an illusion" type discussions are permitted. We are glad to have your involvement too, for as long as you choose.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • It's not physics, it's philosophy.
  • It's not just philosophy, it's bad philosophy.
  • Yesterday "im going else were." - Last Activity, Today. Uh huh.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Back
Top