Motion equations of a disc rotating freely around its center (3d)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the motion equations of a disc rotating freely around its center, pinned at the origin with weights that can tilt it. The disc experiences oscillation similar to a pendulum when weights are added, with gravitational force acting in the negative z-direction. The user seeks expressions for the rotational speed vector and rotation vector, specifically the equations dω/dt = f(t, ω, θ) and dθ/dt = ω, to simulate the system's motion using Runge-Kutta integration. It is noted that the z-component of momentum is always zero, affecting the z-components of both ω and θ. The user acknowledges needing assistance and contemplates reposting in a homework section.
bluekuma
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The system is made of a disc the center of which is pinned to the origin (so the disc cannot translate), and some weights that can be stuck on the disc to make it tilt (weights do not translate on the disc) (see images attached).
There is no friction whatsoever. The only force is gravitational force, with direction opposite to the z-axis'.

Let's start with the disc at rest with its axis parallel to axis z. Now, if you put a weight on it, the disc starts oscillating just as if it was a pendulum. Then, at time t=t0, you put another weight on it.

If \vec{ω} is the rotational speed vector and \vec{θ} is the rotation vector of the disc (meaning the direction of the disc's axis is always the z-versor rotated by θ radians around \vec{θ} ) what's the expression of \vec{f}(t,ω,θ) in:

d\vec{ω}/dt = f(t,ω,θ),
d\vec{θ}/dt = \vec{ω}

Given the initial values \vec{ω}(t0) =\vec{ω}0≠0 and \vec{θ}(t0=\vec{θ}0≠0, d\vec{ω}(t0)/dt≠0,
that would give me a way to simulate the system's motion through a standard Runge-Kutta integration method.

MIGHT HELP TO KNOW:
- I'm pretty sure there is a way to divide the two vectorial equations in six (three systems of two) linear equations
- z-component of momentum \vec{M} (where d\vec{ω}/dt = \vec{M}/I ) is always 0 (zero) as M is the result of a cross product between a vector r (x, y, x) and the gravitational force (0, 0, -mg), therefore z-component of \vec{ω} and \vec{θ} are also 0.

If my teacher is reading this: no, ultimately I could not do it alone, sorry. (This is not homework but I bet he'd get pissed if he knew I asked for help).
 

Attachments

  • disc at rest.jpg
    disc at rest.jpg
    21.8 KB · Views: 470
  • dic in motion.jpg
    dic in motion.jpg
    22.6 KB · Views: 518
Physics news on Phys.org
ok maaaaybe I should have posted this in the homework section, if no admin moves the thread by tomorrow I'll just repost there :D
i'm deeply sorry for the trouble.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top