Motion in Two and Three Dimensions and airplane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance from which an airplane should release a bomb to hit a target while flying at an altitude of 0.50 km and a speed of 150 km/h. Participants explore the use of kinematic equations to determine the time of fall and the horizontal distance traveled. The correct answer for the release distance is established as 417 meters, with calculations involving unit conversions and the gravitational constant. Participants acknowledge initial errors in unit conversion and appreciate the collaborative problem-solving process. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate calculations in physics problems involving motion in two and three dimensions.
patelkey
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
The airplane shown is in level flight at an altitude of 0.50 km and a speed
of 150 km/h. At what distance d should it release a heavy bomb to hit the
target X?

-I tried using x-x0=(v0)(cos(theta))t; and then solving for t with another equation but that does not give me the correct answer when I solve for x. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume it isn't moving for a second. h=500m=0.5*g*t^2 => t=sqrt(2*500m/(10m/s^2)). So it will be in the air for this long. Now assume it is moving along the x-axis for this period of time, t. The distance it will travel will simply be t*(horizontal speed). So if it is moving at 2.5km/s, the distance d will be (2.5km/s)*sqrt(2*500m/(10m/s^2)).

Does this help?
 
No I actually got that answer through a different method, however, the correct answer is 417 m.
 
I'm getting the correct answer to be 414.1m, and that is using what I explained earlier. Except I converted units wrong because I'm tired. :) 150km/h = 41m/s

d=(41m/s)*sqrt(2*500m/(9.8m/s^2))=414m. This is definitely correct.
 
150km/h=41.6666667m/s
==>
d=(41.6666667m/s)*sqrt(2*500m/(9.8m/s^2))=417m

Thar's your 417m.
 
Wow your right
I also converted units wrong
this problem was really annoying,
thanks for the help!
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads

Back
Top