A Mott insulators and electron-electron insulators

Sagar Rawal
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I found this paragraph from one of wiki article, "Mott considers a lattice model with just one electron per site. Without taking the interaction into account, each site could be occupied by two electrons, one with spin up and one with spin down. Due to the interaction the electrons would then feel a strong Coulomb repulsion, which Mott argued splits the band in two: The lower band is then occupied by the first electron per site, the upper by the second. If each site is only occupied by a single electron the lower band is completely filled and the upper band completely empty, the system thus a so-called Mott insulator."

What I don't understood here is

At first it is said that Mott consider a lattice model without taking interaction into account but later mentioned that due to interaction electorns would feel strong columb repulsion? Isn't that contradicts the first statement?

It is first said that he considers just one electron per site but later said each site could be occupied by two electons, which again contradicts the first statement.

So anyone please explain me what I'm missing here or what really affects metals to become insulators or what is mott insulators?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What it is saying that if you disregard the interaction you could have two electrons on each site, not that there is no interaction.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top