Movement of bacterium in the microscope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the average velocity and average speed of a bacterium observed under a microscope. The average velocity is determined using the formula v = Δr/Δt, resulting in a vector of (0.387i - 0.596j + 0.5k) μm^-1. The average speed is calculated as |v| = Δs/Δt, yielding a value of 0.869 μm/s. It is noted that if the bacterium took a non-linear path, the average speed could be significantly higher than the calculated value. For curved paths, optimization techniques or segment length calculations would be necessary to determine the true distance traveled.
negation
Messages
817
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A biologist looking through a microscope sees a bacterium at r1→ = 2.2i + 3.7j -1.2kμm.
After 6.2s, it's at r2→ = 4.6i + 1.9kμm.
a)What is it's average velocity
b) What is its average speed

The Attempt at a Solution

a)
v→= Δr/Δt
v = (r2-r1)/6.2 = (2.4i - 3.7j + 3.1k)μm/6.2s
= (0.387i -0.596j + 0.5k) μm^-1

b)
|v| = Δs/Δt
|v| = SQRT[(2.4)^2i + (-3.7)^2j + (3.1)^2k]/6.2s
= 0.869μms^-1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good.
 
Caution: IF it went from the first location to the second location by a long and winding path,
then the average velocity will be the same but the average speed might have been many times that fast:
so that is a _minimum_ value for the average speed.
 
lightgrav said:
Caution: IF it went from the first location to the second location by a long and winding path,
then the average velocity will be the same but the average speed might have been many times that fast:
so that is a _minimum_ value for the average speed.

If the path was curved, I would have to utilize optimization, am I right?
 
if the path had been curved, you would need to find out long that path was
by adding each small segment length, found via pythagoras (or integrating the path if given a function with time)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top