Intro Physics Moving Beyond Formulae: How to Think Like a Physicist

AI Thread Summary
Understanding physics as fundamental principles rather than just memorizing formulas is essential for deeper learning. Engaging with practical applications through lab courses can significantly enhance comprehension. Hands-on experiments, such as studying collisions with low-friction setups, help solidify theoretical concepts. If labs are unavailable, utilizing online simulations and educational videos can be beneficial. Resources like Khan Academy offer valuable insights into first-year university physics. For those with programming skills, creating simulations of physical phenomena, like 1-D collisions, can further deepen understanding of the underlying principles.
jhyrman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am doing PHYS 172 at Purdue, modern mechanics which begins with algebra and introduces calculus.
I am having a hard time seeing beyond a page of formulae and understanding physics as fundamental principles. The textbook is "Matter and Interactions" by Chabay and Sherwood, and I am also reading through "Fundamentals of Physics" by Shankar and "The Cartoon Guide to Physics" by Gonick and Huffman.
Do you have any suggestions on how to think of physics like a physicist, rather than like a student cramming for a test? I can memorize formulas all day, but I would rather understand more of the "how" and "why."
Thanks,
Josh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a lab course that matches this stuff? Even if you don't have the lab course, does your uni have undergrad labs that you might get permission to go try?

For example, when I studied collisions, they made us do labs on colliding masses. We had an "air track" thing with very low friction especially at speeds of a few 10's of cm/s. Add a strobe light and a simple camera system, and you can do 1-dimensional collisions.

For a lot of things in first year physics there are fairly easy to set up labs. I found that actually playing with systems that matched the equations gave me a lot better understanding. Some of the 2nd year and 3rd year labs were especially interesting. We did a version of the measurement of the speed of light using rotating mirrors that was lots of fun.

If you can't get actual hardware, then you may find some value in simulations. Or possibly from videos of labs. Google for them. Or look around on YouTube. There are a variety of interesting vids on lab tests. Also, Google for the Khan academy. I think they have moved into first year uni physics stuff.

If you are especially keen at programming, you might try writing a simulation. See if you can write up a sim that will show you what happens for an arbitrary 1-D collision, with arbitrary input velocities and masses for two particles, and arbitrary degree of "elasticity" of the collision, up to the two particles sticking.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...
Back
Top