Moving charges: Describing its field as photons

AI Thread Summary
A charged particle moving through a medium generates an electric field, which can be conceptualized as emitting photons that interact with the medium's atoms, causing them to reorient. This interaction is distinct from static electric fields, which do not involve photons, and highlights the difference between classical electromagnetic fields and photon quantization. In the case of Cherenkov radiation, it is the medium that emits light, not the particle itself; the particle's movement rearranges the atoms, leading to the emission of visible Cherenkov light. The discussion emphasizes that while photons are useful for describing particle interactions, classical electromagnetics is more appropriate for static or non-accelerating charges. Understanding these distinctions clarifies the relationship between moving charges and light emission in different contexts.
McLaren Rulez
Messages
289
Reaction score
3
Hi,

I was studying Cherenkov radiation and here's what I read. A charged particle moving through a medium has an electric field. This is equivalent to the particle emitting photons which are absorbed by the atoms of the medium and causes them to reorient themselves.

I am a little uncomfortable with the electric field being viewed as photons. For instance, a static electric field has nothing to do with photons. Also, electromagnetic radiation is quantized as photons. But a moving charge seems to be something in between the two so how is it explained? And does this mean that a moving charge (just moving, not accelerating) emits light? I'm quite muddled about this connection so I'd appreciate an explanation or a good source.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A classical electromagnetic field is not described by photon-Fock states but by coherent states. I don't know, why many people think the photon picture is better than classical electromagnetic fields, if you deal with a situation where classical electromagnetics applies!
 
The photons are used when you want to describe interactions of particles. Ie. if you have 2 electrons with their own electric fields. "How do they know where and what the other one is"? It's easier for us to imagine that they exchange something that gives both a sense of their surroundings, in this case a photon.
Now for Cherenkov light, actually particle doesn't emitt light, the medium does. When a particle faster than light in that medium travels through it, it "rearranges" the molecules and atoms with it's field, or as your professor put it, it gives off imaginary photons so the atoms in material "see" where particle is and where is it going. When the particle passes the molecules and atoms rearrange themselves back and that emitts photons you see as Cherenkov light.
 
Thank you. I think I get it now.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top