Mr.Stewart is confusing me. Estimating sums

In summary: So it's just a matter of convention which one to choose. The important thing is that n must be an integer, and it must be greater than 32.2 in order to satisfy the original inequality.As for why n > 32.2 instead of n > 32.1, it's just a matter of rounding. Since n must be an integer, we round up to the nearest integer, which is 33.
  • #1
flyingpig
2,579
1

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/1404/unledro.png Now what I don't understand is this part

[PLAIN]http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/7479/unledoq.png

Is he trying to say that [tex]\frac{1}{2n^3} = R_n[/tex]? Is that how he deduced that [tex]\frac{1}{2n^3} < 0.0005[/tex]?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, it's saying that Rn <= 1/(2n2), and if he can find an n for which 1/(2n2) < 0.0005, then Rn will be < 0.0005.
 
  • #3
Given the sum [itex]\sum a_n[itex] with [itex]a_n[/itex] decreasing (and, in order that the sum be convergent, they must be decreasing to 0), mark those points [itex](n, a_n)[/itex] on a graph, draw vertical lines from each such point, and a horizontal line from each to the left so that you get a sequence of rectangles, each having width 1, height [itex]a_n[/itex] and so area [itex]a_n[/itex]. The total area in all those is the sum [itex]\sum a_n[/itex].

Now, draw a curve through the upper left corner of each rectangle. Call that function f(x). Then [itex]f(n)= a_n[/itex] for each positive integer n. Also, notice that the curve passes beneath the horizontal line on each rectangle. That is, the area beneath the curve, in each rectangle, is less than the area in that rectangle and the total area under the curve, from x= 1, is less than the total area of the rectangles.

That is,
[tex]\int_1^\infty f(x)dx< \sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n[/tex]

Taking f(x)= [itex]1/x^3[/itex] when [itex]f_n= 1/n^3[/itex] does exactly that.
 
  • #4
Mark44 said:
No, it's saying that Rn <= 1/(2n2), and if he can find an n for which 1/(2n2) < 0.0005, then Rn will be < 0.0005.

So then [tex]R_n\leq \frac{1}{2n^3}[/tex], but he also says [tex]R_n\leq 0.0005[/tex], so how could he turned it into

[tex]\frac{1}{2n^3}<0.0005[/tex]
 
  • #5
If he chooses n so that [tex]\frac{1}{2n^3}<0.0005\,,[/tex] then [tex]R_n\leq \frac{1}{2n^3}<0.0005\quad\to\quad R_n<0.0005[/tex]
 
  • #6
I'm looking at what you posted, and it says

[tex]R_n\leq \frac{1}{2n^2}[/tex]
Note the exponent of 2, not 3.

Stewart doesn't say that 1/(2n2) < 0.0005. He says he wants to find n so that this is true.

If he can find such a number n, then he will have Rn < 0.0005.
 
  • #7
Thanks for catching that Mark44 lol, I didn't realize I had a 3 instead of a 2. I don't know why I keep thinking it is a 3.

I just want to ask, when he solved it, you should get [tex]n>\sqrt{1000}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{1000}\approx 31.6[/tex] and you round up to 32 because there is no such thing as "half a term", but what if n [tex]\sqrt{1000}\approx 31.2[/tex] (31.2 I made up randomlly), would we still choose n to be 32 or 31? At first I thought it would be 32, but my book chooses 31.

It was an another example in my book.
 
  • #8
flyingpig said:
Thanks for catching that Mark44 lol, I didn't realize I had a 3 instead of a 2. I don't know why I keep thinking it is a 3.

I just want to ask, when he solved it, you should get [tex]n>\sqrt{1000}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{1000}\approx 31.6[/tex] and you round up to 32 because there is no such thing as "half a term", but what if n [tex]\sqrt{1000}\approx 31.2[/tex] (31.2 I made up randomlly), would we still choose n to be 32 or 31? At first I thought it would be 32, but my book chooses 31.

It was an another example in my book.
For 1/(2n2) < .0005, you need n > sqrt(1000) ~ 31.6, but you also want n to be an integer, so you take n = 32. If you chose n = 31, then 1/(2n2) ~ .00052, which is larger than .0005.

If you needed to find n > sqrt(973) ~31.2, I would take n = 32. If your book chooses a different number, I would need to see more information about this other problem.
 
  • #9
[PLAIN]http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/1369/unledlh.png

For part c), they did this

[tex]\frac{1}{3n^3}<\frac{1}{10^5}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{n^3}<\frac{3}{10^5}[/tex]

Now here is where it gets confusing, I did some algebra and I found you eventually have to flip over the inequality sign, but if I were to just invert both sides, does that mean I also have to change inequality? Anyways

[PLAIN]http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/9656/unledif.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
flyingpig said:
[PLAIN]http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/1369/unledlh.png

For part c), they did this

[tex]\frac{1}{3n^3}<\frac{1}{10^5}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{n^3}<\frac{3}{10^5}[/tex]

Now here is where it gets confusing, I did some algebra and I found you eventually have to flip over the inequality sign, but if I were to just invert both sides, does that mean I also have to change inequality?
Yes. Assuming that a and b are both positive, a < b ==> 1/a > 1/b.
A geometric explanation is that if b is to the right of a, then 1/b will be a smaller number than 1/a.

flyingpig said:
Anyways

[PLAIN]http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/9656/unledif.png[/QUOTE]

They found n [itex]\approx[/itex] 32.2, so they're taking n > 32. Since n is an integer, this means that n >= 33.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
But why n > 32? The approxixmate is 32.2, which means that it should be n > 32.2

Why choosen n > 32? If it was 32.1, wouldn't the error be no longer within 10^-5?
 
  • #12
Keep in mind that n is an index, so it's an integer value. The inequalities n > 32, n > 32.2, n > 32.1 are all equivalent to n >= 33, for n an integer.
 

Related to Mr.Stewart is confusing me. Estimating sums

1. What is the concept of estimating sums?

The concept of estimating sums is a method used to find an approximate value of a sum by rounding each number to the nearest whole number and then adding them together. This method is often used when working with large numbers or when a quick estimate is needed.

2. How do you estimate sums using rounding?

To estimate sums using rounding, you first round each number to the nearest whole number. Then, add the rounded numbers together to find an approximate sum. For example, if you have the sum 35 + 82 + 46, you would round to 40 + 80 + 50, which gives an estimated sum of 170.

3. Can you use estimation to find an exact sum?

No, estimation is used to find an approximate value of a sum. It is not meant to give an exact answer, but rather a quick estimate that is close to the actual sum.

4. What is the purpose of estimating sums?

The purpose of estimating sums is to quickly find an approximate value of a sum without having to calculate the exact answer. This method is especially useful when working with large numbers or when time is limited.

5. Are there any drawbacks to using estimation to find sums?

One drawback of using estimation to find sums is that it may not always give an accurate answer. Estimation is meant to give a quick estimate that is close to the actual sum, but it may not always be exact. Additionally, estimation does not work well for finding differences between two numbers, as rounding can lead to a significant difference in the estimated answer.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
592
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top