Mr.Stewart is confusing me. Estimating sums

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing Sums
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating sums and understanding the remainder term in series, specifically in the context of convergence criteria and error bounds. Participants are analyzing the implications of inequalities related to the remainder term \( R_n \) and its relationship to a specified threshold.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the remainder term \( R_n \) and the inequalities provided, questioning the validity of assumptions made in the problem setup. There is discussion about the correct interpretation of the bounds and the implications for choosing integer values for \( n \).

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively clarifying misunderstandings regarding the inequalities and the conditions under which they hold. There is a focus on ensuring the correct interpretation of the mathematical expressions and the implications for selecting appropriate values for \( n \). Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of inequalities when inverting terms.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding the rounding of values and the implications of choosing integer values for \( n \), particularly in relation to the convergence criteria and the specified error bounds. There is an emphasis on the importance of understanding the conditions under which the inequalities are valid.

flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/1404/unledro.png Now what I don't understand is this part

[PLAIN]http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/7479/unledoq.png

Is he trying to say that [tex]\frac{1}{2n^3} = R_n[/tex]? Is that how he deduced that [tex]\frac{1}{2n^3} < 0.0005[/tex]?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it's saying that Rn <= 1/(2n2), and if he can find an n for which 1/(2n2) < 0.0005, then Rn will be < 0.0005.
 
Given the sum [itex]\sum a_n[itex]with [itex]a_n[/itex] <b>decreasing</b> (and, in order that the sum be convergent, they must be decreasing to 0), mark those points [itex](n, a_n)[/itex] on a graph, draw vertical lines from each such point, and a horizontal line from each to the left so that you get a sequence of rectangles, each having width 1, height [itex]a_n[/itex] and so area [itex]a_n[/itex]. The total area in all those is the sum [itex]\sum a_n[/itex]. <br /> <br /> Now, draw a curve through the upper <b>left</b> corner of each rectangle. Call that function f(x). Then [itex]f(n)= a_n[/itex] for each positive integer n. Also, notice that the curve passes <b>beneath</b> the horizontal line on each rectangle. That is, the area beneath the curve, in each rectangle, is <b>less</b> than the area in that rectangle and the total area under the curve, from x= 1, is <b>less</b> than the total area of the rectangles.<br /> <br /> That is, <br /> [tex]\int_1^\infty f(x)dx< \sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n[/tex]<br /> <br /> Taking f(x)= [itex]1/x^3[/itex] when [itex]f_n= 1/n^3[/itex] does exactly that.[/itex][/itex]
 
Mark44 said:
No, it's saying that Rn <= 1/(2n2), and if he can find an n for which 1/(2n2) < 0.0005, then Rn will be < 0.0005.

So then [tex]R_n\leq \frac{1}{2n^3}[/tex], but he also says [tex]R_n\leq 0.0005[/tex], so how could he turned it into

[tex]\frac{1}{2n^3}<0.0005[/tex]
 
If he chooses n so that [tex]\frac{1}{2n^3}<0.0005\,,[/tex] then [tex]R_n\leq \frac{1}{2n^3}<0.0005\quad\to\quad R_n<0.0005[/tex]
 
I'm looking at what you posted, and it says

[tex]R_n\leq \frac{1}{2n^2}[/tex]
Note the exponent of 2, not 3.

Stewart doesn't say that 1/(2n2) < 0.0005. He says he wants to find n so that this is true.

If he can find such a number n, then he will have Rn < 0.0005.
 
Thanks for catching that Mark44 lol, I didn't realize I had a 3 instead of a 2. I don't know why I keep thinking it is a 3.

I just want to ask, when he solved it, you should get [tex]n>\sqrt{1000}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{1000}\approx 31.6[/tex] and you round up to 32 because there is no such thing as "half a term", but what if n [tex]\sqrt{1000}\approx 31.2[/tex] (31.2 I made up randomlly), would we still choose n to be 32 or 31? At first I thought it would be 32, but my book chooses 31.

It was an another example in my book.
 
flyingpig said:
Thanks for catching that Mark44 lol, I didn't realize I had a 3 instead of a 2. I don't know why I keep thinking it is a 3.

I just want to ask, when he solved it, you should get [tex]n>\sqrt{1000}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{1000}\approx 31.6[/tex] and you round up to 32 because there is no such thing as "half a term", but what if n [tex]\sqrt{1000}\approx 31.2[/tex] (31.2 I made up randomlly), would we still choose n to be 32 or 31? At first I thought it would be 32, but my book chooses 31.

It was an another example in my book.
For 1/(2n2) < .0005, you need n > sqrt(1000) ~ 31.6, but you also want n to be an integer, so you take n = 32. If you chose n = 31, then 1/(2n2) ~ .00052, which is larger than .0005.

If you needed to find n > sqrt(973) ~31.2, I would take n = 32. If your book chooses a different number, I would need to see more information about this other problem.
 
[PLAIN]http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/1369/unledlh.png

For part c), they did this

[tex]\frac{1}{3n^3}<\frac{1}{10^5}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{n^3}<\frac{3}{10^5}[/tex]

Now here is where it gets confusing, I did some algebra and I found you eventually have to flip over the inequality sign, but if I were to just invert both sides, does that mean I also have to change inequality? Anyways

[PLAIN]http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/9656/unledif.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
flyingpig said:
[PLAIN]http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/1369/unledlh.png

For part c), they did this

[tex]\frac{1}{3n^3}<\frac{1}{10^5}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{n^3}<\frac{3}{10^5}[/tex]

Now here is where it gets confusing, I did some algebra and I found you eventually have to flip over the inequality sign, but if I were to just invert both sides, does that mean I also have to change inequality?
Yes. Assuming that a and b are both positive, a < b ==> 1/a > 1/b.
A geometric explanation is that if b is to the right of a, then 1/b will be a smaller number than 1/a.

flyingpig said:
Anyways

[PLAIN]http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/9656/unledif.png[/QUOTE]

They found n [itex]\approx[/itex] 32.2, so they're taking n > 32. Since n is an integer, this means that n >= 33.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
But why n > 32? The approxixmate is 32.2, which means that it should be n > 32.2

Why choosen n > 32? If it was 32.1, wouldn't the error be no longer within 10^-5?
 
  • #12
Keep in mind that n is an index, so it's an integer[/color] value. The inequalities n > 32, n > 32.2, n > 32.1 are all equivalent to n >= 33, for n an integer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K