MTW Ex 21.15 - Curvature independent of Lapse and Shift functions

TerryW
Gold Member
Messages
222
Reaction score
20
Homework Statement
I'm completely baffled as to where to start on this!
Relevant Equations
See attached image of MTW Ex 21.15
Can anyone out there give me a hint as to where to start with this problem?

I've been looking at it for a while and can't see a way forward.

What exactly is "the curvature itself" here?BTW I think the dynamic initial value equations 21.116 and 21.117 are incorrect. MTW should have inserted to ADM equivalents of these equations.

Any help would be appreciated.Regards
TerryW
Ex 21.15.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The best place to start with this problem is by understanding what the curvature itself is. Curvature is a measure of how much a surface or space is curved. It can be defined as the rate at which a line deviates from being straight. Once you understand what the curvature is, you can then begin to work on solving the dynamic initial value equations. You may find it helpful to review the ADM (Arnowitt–Deser–Misner) formalism, which is a set of equations used to describe the dynamics of curved spacetime in general relativity. This formalism can be used to solve the dynamic initial value equations. Additionally, you may find it helpful to consult other resources, such as textbooks or online tutorials, that provide more detailed solutions to the equations.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top