Multi-variable integration with polar coordination

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
12 replies · 3K views
MasterWu77
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int[/tex] of R ( sin( x^2 + y^2) ) dA where the region 4[tex]\leq[/tex] x^2+y^2 [tex]\leq[/tex] 49

Homework Equations



not too sure but i know that dy dx = r d(r) d(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution



i don't understand how to change into polar coordinates in order to integrate. I'm unsure of how the 4[tex]\leq[/tex] x^2+y^2 [tex]\leq[/tex] 49 becomes the r i need to integrate with. and if i do get that then how do i change the other bounds of integrate for the d (theta)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MasterWu77 said:

Homework Statement



[tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int[/tex] of R ( sin( x^2 + y^2) ) dA where the region 4[tex]\leq[/tex] x^2+y^2 [tex]\leq[/tex] 49
What does "of R" mean in your integral? Does it represent the region you are describing, or is it some factor in the integrand?
MasterWu77 said:

Homework Equations



not too sure but i know that dy dx = r d(r) d(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution



i don't understand how to change into polar coordinates in order to integrate. I'm unsure of how the 4[tex]\leq[/tex] x^2+y^2 [tex]\leq[/tex] 49 becomes the r i need to integrate with. and if i do get that then how do i change the other bounds of integrate for the d (theta)
The region described by the inequalities is an annulus (a shape like a washer) that lies outside the circle x^2 + y^2 = 4 and inside the circle x^2 + y^2 = 49. In this region, r is going to be between two values.

Your integrand is pretty simple to change to polar coordinates, since r^2 = x^2 + y^2.
 
the R refers to the region that is being described. sorry for not clarifying that earlier.

so with r^2 = x^2 + y^2, does that mean the bounds of d(r) would be from 4 to 49? and if so then would the bound of the integral for d(theta) be from 0 to 2(pi) since it is a complete circle?
 
r does NOT range from 4 to 49. Draw the circles and it should be clear to you why this is so.
[itex]\theta[/itex] does range from 0 to 2[itex]\pi[/itex].
 
ah ok. i believe i see what you mean.

after looking at the circles i think i see that r ranges from 2 to 7 which would be the radius of the circles. and so from there on do i just need to a double integral of sin(r^2) r dr d(theta)? or is there some other little step I'm missing?
 
ok awesome. i got that integral and then attempted to solve for it.

i used a u substitution for the sin(r^2) where:
u=r^2
du= 2rdr

and i ended up with

-(1/2) [tex]\int cos(u)d(theta)[/tex]
where the integral is bounded from 0 to 2(pi) and the cos (u) goes from 4 to 49 because of the u substitution i used. i put the answer in and it said that it was incorrect
 
Your second integral should look like this:
[tex](-1/2)\int_{\theta = 0}^{2\pi}\left(cos(49) - cos(4)\right) d\theta[/tex]

Edit: Added multiplier to front of integral.
 
Last edited:
ok i got that but shouldn't there be a (-1/2) out in front of the integral to account for the u substitution?

when i solve for the integral should i get

[(cos(49)-cos(4))* 2pi]

since the there isn't originally a [tex]\theta[/tex] so by taking the integral with respect to [tex]\theta[/tex] a [tex]\theta[/tex] should appear which can be bounded by the 2pi and 0
 
MasterWu77 said:
ok i got that but shouldn't there be a (-1/2) out in front of the integral to account for the u substitution?
Yes, it was in my notes, but I neglected to put that in my post.
MasterWu77 said:
when i solve for the integral should i get

[(cos(49)-cos(4))* 2pi]

since the there isn't originally a [tex]\theta[/tex] so by taking the integral with respect to [tex]\theta[/tex] a [tex]\theta[/tex] should appear which can be bounded by the 2pi and 0
Yes, but you need to put in the missing (-1/2). If you evaluate your answer, remember that the numbers are real numbers (i.e., radians), not degrees.
 
ah ok i finally got the right answer! it turns out that the answer is negative but i didn't think that was possible since we're computing an area so wouldn't the answer be a positive number?
 
No, you're not computing the area of the region R. If you were, the integrand would be 1, not sin(x^2 + y^2). A lot of the surface z = sin(x^2 + y^2) must lie below the x-y plane for the integral to come out negative.
 
o ok that makes sense! thank you very much for helping me with this problem and helping me to understand the concept better :smile: