Multiple Choice problem (internal energy)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the conditions under which two objects of the same material can have the same internal energies. Participants are exploring concepts related to internal energy, heat capacity, and thermal equilibrium, particularly in the context of thermodynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity of various assumptions regarding mass, density, and temperature in relation to internal energy. Some are attempting to reason through examples, while others express uncertainty about their understanding of the concepts involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their thoughts and reasoning. Some have provided insights about the relationship between mass, temperature, and internal energy, while others are still grappling with the fundamental concepts. There is no clear consensus yet, but various interpretations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention upcoming lectures on thermodynamics and express difficulty in finding reliable sources for information related to the question. There is an indication of differing opinions on the nature of internal energy and its properties.

cathole
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
What must be true for two objects of the same material to have the same internal energies?
(Choose all that apply)

a. The masses of both objects must be equal

b. Both objects must have the same density

c. The temperatures of both objects must be equal

d. Separate objects cannot have identical internal energies

I guessed a,b,c and was wrong. I am thinking only a &b. Please tell me what you think.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You aren't saying why you think any of those are true. Guessing may be the wrong strategy. How would you calculate internal energy of a system given temperature and masses of the component objects, assuming it's an ideal gas for example?
 
Dick,
I have no clue what "strategy" to go with, that's the whole reason I'm here.
 
cathole said:
Dick,
I have no clue what "strategy" to go with, that's the whole reason I'm here.

Right, but can you think of two objects whose masses are equal but have different internal energies? Two objects whose densities are equal but have different internal energies etc. etc. That's the sort of strategy I'm talking about. Are ANY of those true? All I know is guessing won't work. They wouldn't give you this question if you didn't know SOMETHING.
 
Last edited:
You've got the right general idea about what internal energy is, that's a start. But try and make that general idea more concrete. Don't you have ANY specific examples to reason from? Like I said ideal gases would be a good starting point. But why do you think temperature doesn't matter? Doesn't that determine internal kinetic energies and vibrational energies? Are you really supposed to answer this starting from ground zero?
 
Yes, ground zero. I am leaning towards mass and temperature as the answer to the question.
 
I will have two lectures on thermodynamics in the coming week. I'm trying to complete online homework and can't find a good source of information for this question.
 
I think I've got it.

The objects have to have the same mass in order to have equal heat capacity.

The objects have to have the same temperature to be in thermal equilibrium.

If there heat capacity and thermal equilibrium are identical, their internal energy will be the same.
 
cathole said:
I think I've got it.

The objects have to have the same mass in order to have equal heat capacity.

The objects have to have the same temperature to be in thermal equilibrium.

If there heat capacity and thermal equilibrium are identical, their internal energy will be the same.

No, that's not it. If sample A has internal energy E, and sample B has internal energy 2E, then two copies of A have the same internal energy as B, right? Internal energy is an extensive property, yes? Do A and B have to have any properties in common?
 
  • #10
Here it is...
 

Attachments

  • ScreenShot001.jpg
    ScreenShot001.jpg
    19 KB · Views: 536
  • #11
If it's 'separate objects cannot have equal internal energies', that's a bunch of baloney.
 
  • #12
the image shows my response just minutes ago. you can see it gave me credit for my response. (my response in green) the check mark is just in a weird spot, that's not the answer.

thanks for your efforts.
 
  • #13
Well, congratulations. I really can't agree with their answers. But there you go. You're welcome.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K