Multiple Rotating Masses in Revolution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the motion of a system with two counterweights on rotating arms driven by electric motors. The initial setup involves the weights rotating around a grounded blue shaft, with the goal of understanding the rotational position of the green arms over time. Key points include the conservation of angular momentum, which affects how the green arms swing based on the positioning of the red weights. Synchronization of the red axes is crucial to maintain the desired rotational vibration, as any phase difference can lead to unintended translational forces. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of mass distribution and timing in achieving effective motion.
JaredJHuffman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I've simplified my question to make it easier to explain; I'm trying to find a way to determine the motion of a freely turning body as resultant of 2 counter-weights on rotating arms.

Here's my write-up:

Description: Electric motors turn both orange shafts clockwise at constant angular velocity. Both weights start out closest to the center blue shaft as shown in Position 0 and rotate with their respective orange shafts. The orange shafts turn freely with respect to the green arms, and the green arms turn freely with respect to the blue shaft. All objects’ masses are negligible except for the red counterweight blocks, and the blue shaft is grounded. See pictures for positions 0, 1, and 2 for the relative motion of the red arms at 90 degree intervals.

Question: What is the rotational position of the green arms over time? What factors will affect this motion?

Thanks for any help you can offer! Let me know if there's anything I can clear up about the situation.
 

Attachments

  • RotatingSystem-Position0.JPG
    RotatingSystem-Position0.JPG
    22.3 KB · Views: 446
  • RotatingSystem-Position1.JPG
    RotatingSystem-Position1.JPG
    23.2 KB · Views: 399
  • RotatingSystem-Position2.JPG
    RotatingSystem-Position2.JPG
    28 KB · Views: 397
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

I assume you mean, that the motors turn the red arms relative to the green arms with constant angular velocity (and not freely as you said). If so, conservation of the initial zero (angular) momentum will make the line from the CM of one block to the CM of the other stay fixed in inertial space, meaning the green arm will swing out to a maximum when the red arm is at 90 deg to the green arm (picture 2) and then back in when the angle is 180 deg (picture 3). Seen from above the red blocks would appear to slide directly away from the blue center and then directly back in. To the extend the green arms do have some mass, they will carry some of the momentum making the red blocks (as seen from above) describe ellipses instead of straight in and out. The more mass the green arms have relative to the red blocks the less the green arms swing out and in and the more the red blocks describe a circle as seen from above.

PS: I assume this is not homework. If it is, you should ignore my answer and post in the homework section of the forum.
 
Thanks for the explanation! I'm actually trying to impart a vibration by the oscillation of the green bars, so this is the motion I was hoping to get. If I understand correctly, I could get less sweep out of the green bars by shortening the red bars or by lengthening the green bars (or both)?
 
JaredJHuffman said:
If I understand correctly, I could get less sweep out of the green bars by shortening the red bars or by lengthening the green bars (or both)?

Yes.

If this is going to be a practical device for vibrating the green part you most likely need to ensure that the angular position of the two red axis relative to the green arms are synchronized. If you don't and one of the axis gets 180 deg out of phase with the other, the green part will no longer rotate back and forth around the blue axis but just deliver a translational force that rotates.

If you are only interested in delivering a rotational vibration I would think it should be possible to make a simpler device that requires only a single drive engine and a single moving part.
 
You're absolutely right about the timing; even a few degrees out of time would cause it to drift. Thanks for all the help!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top