Multiple Rotating Masses in Revolution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the motion of a system with two counterweights on rotating arms driven by electric motors. The initial setup involves the weights rotating around a grounded blue shaft, with the goal of understanding the rotational position of the green arms over time. Key points include the conservation of angular momentum, which affects how the green arms swing based on the positioning of the red weights. Synchronization of the red axes is crucial to maintain the desired rotational vibration, as any phase difference can lead to unintended translational forces. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of mass distribution and timing in achieving effective motion.
JaredJHuffman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I've simplified my question to make it easier to explain; I'm trying to find a way to determine the motion of a freely turning body as resultant of 2 counter-weights on rotating arms.

Here's my write-up:

Description: Electric motors turn both orange shafts clockwise at constant angular velocity. Both weights start out closest to the center blue shaft as shown in Position 0 and rotate with their respective orange shafts. The orange shafts turn freely with respect to the green arms, and the green arms turn freely with respect to the blue shaft. All objects’ masses are negligible except for the red counterweight blocks, and the blue shaft is grounded. See pictures for positions 0, 1, and 2 for the relative motion of the red arms at 90 degree intervals.

Question: What is the rotational position of the green arms over time? What factors will affect this motion?

Thanks for any help you can offer! Let me know if there's anything I can clear up about the situation.
 

Attachments

  • RotatingSystem-Position0.JPG
    RotatingSystem-Position0.JPG
    22.3 KB · Views: 449
  • RotatingSystem-Position1.JPG
    RotatingSystem-Position1.JPG
    23.2 KB · Views: 401
  • RotatingSystem-Position2.JPG
    RotatingSystem-Position2.JPG
    28 KB · Views: 399
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

I assume you mean, that the motors turn the red arms relative to the green arms with constant angular velocity (and not freely as you said). If so, conservation of the initial zero (angular) momentum will make the line from the CM of one block to the CM of the other stay fixed in inertial space, meaning the green arm will swing out to a maximum when the red arm is at 90 deg to the green arm (picture 2) and then back in when the angle is 180 deg (picture 3). Seen from above the red blocks would appear to slide directly away from the blue center and then directly back in. To the extend the green arms do have some mass, they will carry some of the momentum making the red blocks (as seen from above) describe ellipses instead of straight in and out. The more mass the green arms have relative to the red blocks the less the green arms swing out and in and the more the red blocks describe a circle as seen from above.

PS: I assume this is not homework. If it is, you should ignore my answer and post in the homework section of the forum.
 
Thanks for the explanation! I'm actually trying to impart a vibration by the oscillation of the green bars, so this is the motion I was hoping to get. If I understand correctly, I could get less sweep out of the green bars by shortening the red bars or by lengthening the green bars (or both)?
 
JaredJHuffman said:
If I understand correctly, I could get less sweep out of the green bars by shortening the red bars or by lengthening the green bars (or both)?

Yes.

If this is going to be a practical device for vibrating the green part you most likely need to ensure that the angular position of the two red axis relative to the green arms are synchronized. If you don't and one of the axis gets 180 deg out of phase with the other, the green part will no longer rotate back and forth around the blue axis but just deliver a translational force that rotates.

If you are only interested in delivering a rotational vibration I would think it should be possible to make a simpler device that requires only a single drive engine and a single moving part.
 
You're absolutely right about the timing; even a few degrees out of time would cause it to drift. Thanks for all the help!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top