Multiplication in a Definite Integral Equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the manipulation of a definite integral equation, specifically how to multiply an integral by a constant or a function while maintaining the integrity of the equation. Participants explore the implications of such multiplications on both sides of the equation and the conditions under which they can be applied.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to multiply the left side of the equation by a constant while keeping the equation valid.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the necessity of multiplication and emphasizes that both sides should be multiplied by the same factor to maintain equality.
  • A different participant suggests substituting variables for clarity and performing the multiplication as in algebra.
  • Some participants note that if the constant or function is independent of the integral, it can be multiplied without affecting the integral's value.
  • There is a proposal that if the multiplying factor changes the integral, it must be treated differently, leading to a modified equation involving a new function.
  • One participant points out that if the integral is with respect to x, the result should not be a function of x, indicating a potential misunderstanding in the manipulation of the integral.
  • Concerns are raised about placing a function in the denominator inside the integral after multiplication, suggesting limitations on how the integral can be manipulated.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which multiplication can be applied to the integral and the implications of such operations. There is no consensus on the best approach to take when modifying the integral or the equation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations regarding the independence of the multiplying factor from the integral and the implications of changing the integral's structure. There are unresolved questions about the nature of the functions involved and their interactions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or practitioners dealing with integral equations in mathematics, particularly those interested in the manipulation of definite integrals and the conditions for maintaining equality in equations.

drewfstr314
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
If

[itex]f(x)=\int_0^\infty g(x) dx[/itex]

and I wanted to multiply the integral by, say, a, what would I multiply the left side by? In other words,

[itex]? \times f(x) = a \int_0^\infty g(x) dx[/itex]

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm a little confused, why/what do you want to multiply? If you want to keep the equation the same, you multiply both sides by the same thing, if you want to change the integral, you wouldn't do anything to the other side.
 
Call f(x)=u and the integral v. Then, do the multiplication as you would in algebra, and then substitute the integral and the function back in.
 
Hey drewfstr314 and welcome to the forums.

If a is independent of the integral (which it should be), then yes that it what it does. It doesn't have to be a constant, it can be a function of any variable, but it can't be something that changes the integral: it has to be orthogonal or independent of the integral unless you specify otherwise in a special constraint of some sort.
 
chiro said:
Hey drewfstr314 and welcome to the forums.

If a is independent of the integral (which it should be), then yes that it what it does. It doesn't have to be a constant, it can be a function of any variable, but it can't be something that changes the integral: it has to be orthogonal or independent of the integral unless you specify otherwise in a special constraint of some sort.

What if a did change the integral. I guess I mean something like

[itex]? \times f(x) = h(x) \int_0^\infty \left( \frac{g(x)}{h(x)}\right) dx[/itex]

since multiplying the integral by h(x) would make the integral of only g(x).
 
Last edited:
Just so you know, if your definite integral integrates with respect to x, then your final answer won't be a function of x (other than being a constant function of x), so in your first equation, f(x) = C. However, if you multiply both sides by h(x), you can't put h(x) in the denominator inside the integral.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K