Multivariable Calculus: Applications of Grad (and the Chain Rule?)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of a differentiable function defined on \(\mathbb{R}^n\) that is homogeneous of degree \(p\). The original poster seeks to demonstrate that \(\mathbf{x} \cdot \nabla f(\mathbf{x}) = p f(\mathbf{x})\) using the chain rule.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate the chain rule to the problem but expresses confusion about its application in this context. They also explore differentiating the homogeneity condition with respect to \(a\) and question how the chain rule connects to their situation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on differentiating the homogeneity condition, and there is an ongoing exploration of the implications of this differentiation. The discussion is active, with participants questioning and clarifying the application of the chain rule.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates uncertainty about the necessity of the chain rule in this context, suggesting a potential gap in understanding how to apply it to the problem at hand.

gadje
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We say that a differentiable function [tex]f : \mathbb{R}^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}[/tex] is homogenous of degree p if, for every [tex]\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^n[/tex] and every a>0,
[tex]f(a\mathbf{x}) = a^pf(\mathbf{x}).[/tex]

Show that, if f is homogenous, then [tex]\mathbf{x} \cdot \nabla f(\mathbf{x}) = p f(\mathbf{x})[/tex] .

Homework Equations


The chain rule (not sure if I need it): [tex]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dt} f(\mathbf{x}(t)) = \Sigma_{i = 1}^{n} f_{x_i}\dot{x_i} = \dot{\mathbf{x}} \cdot \nabla f[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I see the resemblance between the rightmost hand side of the chain rule I wrote down, but I don't really understand how the chain rule is applied in this situation, seeing as there isn't anything about x being a function of something else here.

Any ideas?
Cheers.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try differentiating

[tex]f(a\mathbf{x}) = a^pf(\mathbf{x})[/tex]

with respect to a.
 
[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial a} f(a \mathbf{x}) = pa^{p-1}f(\mathbf{x})[/tex]

Okay. I'm still clueless.

EDIT:

Hang on. [tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial a} f(a \mathbf{x}) = \frac{\partial}{\partial a} (a \mathbf{x}) \frac{\partial}{\partial \mathbf{x}} f(a\mathbf{x}) = \mathbf{x} \cdot \nabla f (a \mathbf{x})[/tex] (if you'll forgive the abuse of notation), right?
 
Last edited:
Good. Now let a=1.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K