Must the State |O,ready> Be Orthogonal to |O,reads up> and |O,reads down>?

deneve
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
In the measurement ansatz below, must the state |O,ready> be orthogonal to |O,reads up> and |O,reads down>]?

|+x> |O,ready> =1/(sqrt2)[|+z> + |-z>] |O,ready> (1)

---------→ 1/(sqrt2)[|+z> + |-z>] |O,ready> (2)


--------→ 1/(sqrt2)[|+z>|O,reads up> + |-z>|O,reads down>] (3)


If |O,ready> = [a|O,reads up> + b|O,reads down>] was applied to (2) then it would give an entangled state and if a,b were functions of time then a suitable a and b can't be found that a hamiltonian could reach since

1/(sqrt2)[|+z> + |-z>] |O,ready>
= 1/(sqrt2)[|+z> + |-z>] [a|O,reads up> + b|O,reads down>]

=1/(sqrt2)(a|+z>|O,reads up>+b|+z>|O,reads down>+a|-z>|O,reads up>+b|-z|O,reads down>) which cannot equal (3) for any a,b.

Am I correct here?
Many thanks for any help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
.Yes, you are correct. The state |O,ready> must be orthogonal to both |O,reads up> and |O,reads down> in order for the measurement ansatz to be valid.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top