Mutual Inductance: Coil 1 Excited, Coil 2 Open Circuited

AI Thread Summary
Mutual inductance occurs even when the second coil is open-circuited because the mutual flux linking both coils, Φ21, is not dependent on the circuit condition of the second coil. When coil one is excited, it generates a magnetic field that induces flux in coil two, despite it being open-circuited. If the second coil is removed, only the leakage flux remains, but the mutual flux remains the same as it is linked to the core. The first coil effectively acts as the sole inductor in the core when the second coil is not connected. This understanding clarifies the behavior of inductance in coupled coils.
ezcheez
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have a very basic question regarding mutual inductance.

Consider a basic square loop with two coils wound on opposite sides from each other, with coil one excited while coil two si left open circuited. The total flux linking coil 1 is

Φ11 = Φl121

where

Φ11 is the total flux linking coil 1
Φl1 is the leakage flux and
Φ21 is the mutual flux linking both coils

My question is why there is mutual flux if the second coil is open-circuited, in other words, why is Φ21 non-zero? I would expect flux through the iron core due to coil one but how/why does coil two contribute to this flux?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here \phi_{l1} is the leakage flux i.e., the flux which is linking only with first winding and not with second winding and is due to imperfect coupling. The flux \phi_{l21} is the one which interlinks with both windings. Since \phi_{l21} has nothing to do with the second coil's open or short circuit conditions it won't be zero. You may refer the Wikipedia's page below
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leakage_inductance
 
Let me take step back and ask this question:

What would happen to the flux in the magnetic core if the second coil is removed? Does only the leakage flux remain, or would some flux still flow through the whole core?
 
In fact when the second coil is open circuited, the first coil behaves as if it is the only inductor present in the core. So even if the second coil is removed, the flux going through the core \phi_{l21} will be the same.
 
That helps a great deal. I am going to ponder that for a little while...
 
n.karthick said:
In fact when the second coil is open circuited, the first coil behaves as if it is the only inductor present in the core. So even if the second coil is removed, the flux going through the core \phi_{l21} will be the same.
Hey Karthick,
This is different you have been discussing,Should I use N1+N2 for the no.of turns in the B=U0NI/L where both the coils are one over the other , but one is NOT Connected?
Or should I take only N1 or N2 which ever coil is driven by DRIVE CIRCUIT.

Regards
Geetika
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top