My little theory: what would happen?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phylicity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
phylicity
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
First post ever! Long time forum browser, but only registered yesterday! =D
I'm in my final year of high school, and have therefore only properly been doing Physics for two years, but it's something I'd like to pursue in university. Sorry if my knowledge of relativity is lacking a little...

I had this possibly stupid notion a while back... It's all hypothetical obviously:
We, happily standing in our inert reference frame, see someone start to run. They get faster and faster... in fact, they soon approach the speed of light.
Am I right in saying that we will observe them to gain mass?
BUT... in their reference frame, they are stationary. So will they be aware they have gained mass? If they were to measure their own mass, would they find it to have increased?

If anyone has any idea about this, please tell! Not sure if I'm wrong!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phylicity said:
BUT... in their reference frame, they are stationary. So will they be aware they have gained mass? If they were to measure their own mass, would they find it to have increased?

No, on both counts. Nor will they notice themselves as being length-contracted, nor will they notice their clocks running slower.

To see why this has to be true, note that relativistic effects work both ways. The runner also observes you as being length-contracted, time-dilated, etc.

Now imagine that you are being observed by two runners, running at different speeds relative to you. The two runners will observe you being affected by different amounts of length contraction, time dilation and relativistic mass increase. But you obviously cannot observe yourself as simultaneously having masses of 70 kg and 100 kg!
 
Thanks!
 
phylicity said:
First post ever! Long time forum browser, but only registered yesterday! =D
Welcome to PF! Or at least welcome to the posting side of PF :smile:
phylicity said:
We, happily standing in our inert reference frame, see someone start to run. They get faster and faster... in fact, they soon approach the speed of light.
Am I right in saying that we will observe them to gain mass?
There is more than one concept of mass in SR, and some ongoing debate about which is the best mass to use. We will observe them to gain http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/mass.html" . They will not gain rest mass because it is invariant.
phylicity said:
BUT... in their reference frame, they are stationary. So will they be aware they have gained mass? If they were to measure their own mass, would they find it to have increased?
In their own frame they will obviously only measure their rest mass, which is relativistically invariant and will not change.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top