Naimark extension for continuous variables

atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,379
For discrete variables, a POVM on a system can be thought of as a projective measurement on the system coupled to an apparatus. This is called the Naimark extension. Is this also true for continuous variables?

http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.6815 (Theorem 4, p10)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say yes.

Continuous variables are best handled by the Rigged Hilbert Space formalism which is simply a limit of the finite case.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
So presumably if I would like to make an "accurate" measurement of a system's position, in the Naimark extension I should not measure the position of the ancilla? The reason I'm thinking this is that the position of the ancilla will not have any eigenvectors in the Hilbert space, so one must measure some other observable of the ancilla that has eigenvectors in the Hilbert space?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top