What is the relationship between momentum and mass in the context of light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SimonB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Photon
SimonB
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi

This is probably very naive!

What is wrong with the following

The (momentum of light) = E/c so it is then possible to write this as
(mass of light x speed of light) = E/c

and thus ... E = mc^2

... this came up after I read the following with my students

http://www.davidbodanis.com/pages/promised_note_high school2.html

Which starts with Momentum = E/c but then takes a long route round to E = mc^2

Simon
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's wrong with it, is that "mass of light" is zero, so you are saying 0 = E / c.
For light, the momentum is related to the wavelength, not the mass. The correct formula is
E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2
which for a particle at rest reduces to E = mc^2 and for a photon with momentum p to E / c = p.

In fact, you may want to read https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1285138&postcount=6 ).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"momentum= mass times velocity" does not apply to light.
 
"the momentum is related to the wavelength,"

and the wavelength is related to the energy. the total energy of any system is the critical element of consideration, and there is a reason why a system is treated mathematically via its total energy, rather than addressing mass and energy separately in a moving or accelerating system. it seems disingenuous to attempt to deal with mass and energy as f they were different entities - they are only different manifestations of the same thing.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Back
Top