Name of representation of vectors perpendicular to the plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the representation of vectors perpendicular to a plane, specifically the symbols ⊗ and ⊙, commonly used in physics for magnetic fields and currents. Participants clarify that these vectors are referred to as normals to the plane. One user mentions that the representation may also be known as the dot cross system, although no definitive name is provided. The conversation welcomes new participants and encourages further engagement. Overall, the focus remains on identifying the terminology associated with these vector representations.
duddo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Most physicists are familiar with the representation of vectors perpendicular to the plane (\otimes and \odot) which look like the fletching or head of an arrow, commonly used to represent magnetic fields, currents and so on.

Can anyone tell me the name of this representation? Does it even have a name?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean of the ⊗ and ⊙ symbols? That I don't know, but the vectors perpendicular to the plane are called normals to the plane. I bet you knew that already, but I thought I'd post it to exclude that from any future posts.
 
welcome to pf!

hi duddo! welcome to pf! :smile:

i think some people call it the dot cross system, but i don't know of any other name
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Electric and magnetic field lines in a plane wave of finite extent
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Understanding the Barkhausen–Kurz tube
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Visualizing fields around coils (statics and magnetostatics)
Replies
5
Views
908
Torque on a Circular Current Loop under a Misaligned Magnetic Field
Replies
1
Views
938
Ship thrust required to move out of the plane of our solar system
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Calculating group representation matrices from basis vector/function
Replies
6
Views
2K
Things to talk about in a Polarization Write-up
Replies
1
Views
2K
I I need some support, please, for a gravity assist analysis
2
Replies
86
Views
7K
I Adjoint Representation Confusion
Replies
3
Views
3K
I Why do physicists show the magnetic field perpendicular to F
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top