Name of the forces caused while driving a car

  • Thread starter Thread starter Equineguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differing perceptions of ride comfort between drivers and passengers, highlighting a psychological phenomenon related to control and trust. Passengers often feel less secure due to their lack of control over the vehicle, leading to heightened awareness of speed and forces, while drivers may become desensitized to these sensations. This desensitization can be likened to "tolerance" in medicine, where individuals adapt to certain stimuli over time. The conversation also touches on the arbitrary nature of speed limits and how driving slightly over them can feel more comfortable for experienced drivers. Overall, the feelings experienced by passengers and drivers reflect a complex interplay of psychological factors and perceived control during driving.
Equineguy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is there a name or phenomenon of the feelings the passenger gets that the driver does not?
Example: A driver of a car feels that they are driving smooth and comfortable, yet the passenger feels like they have to hold on to the door handle and feels that the ride is rough.
If the two folks in the car reverse roles, the same holds true.

Is this a physics item, or more psychological?

I would imagine that a person will get used to the speeds and forces in time, causing them to feel "numb" to the forces, in medicine the is called "tolerance". Would that be called the same with forces that we become "numb" to? Or is there another name?

This may explain why we feel that going the speed limit for experienced drivers seems so dull and slow, causing us to speed up to what "feels" better for them.

This is for a project I am doing in attempt to explain why we feel the need to go faster than the speed limit and the risks that accompany it, while having a false sense of control. ( other than the thrill seekers looking for the rush )

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Equineguy said:
Is there a name or phenomenon of the feelings the passenger gets that the driver does not?
Example: A driver of a car feels that they are driving smooth and comfortable, yet the passenger feels like they have to hold on to the door handle and feels that the ride is rough.
If the two folks in the car reverse roles, the same holds true.

Is this a physics item, or more psychological?

I would imagine that a person will get used to the speeds and forces in time, causing them to feel "numb" to the forces, in medicine the is called "tolerance". Would that be called the same with forces that we become "numb" to? Or is there another name?

This may explain why we feel that going the speed limit for experienced drivers seems so dull and slow, causing us to speed up to what "feels" better for them.

This is for a project I am doing in attempt to explain why we feel the need to go faster than the speed limit and the risks that accompany it, while having a false sense of control. ( other than the thrill seekers looking for the rush )

Thanks!

Welcome to the PF.

It's probably a psychological issue related to control over your circumstances. I don't know the technical name for it, nor do I have peer-reviewed references on it. But I'm sure others here will be able to supply those.
 
The driver has a steering wheel to hold on to, the passenger doesn't. Depending on the area, many people tend to drive a bit over the speed limit, about 5 mph (8kph) or so. I live in a urban area in California and the morning commuters tend to drive the fastest on the freeway a bit less than 10 mph (16 kph) over the speed limit. It's basically the threshold for getting a ticket for speeding.
 
I think it is psychological and is about trust.
The passenger's safety and possibly their survival is completely in the hands of another person,
So the relationship between the driver and the passenger makes a big difference.
 
I don't know of a technical name for the phenomenon, but I do know the feelings stem from lack of control and not knowing what's coming next. The driver has control and knows in advance what inertial changes are coming up. Most passengers like smoothness and consistency.
 
A passenger can get annoyed at the driver for going to slow and letting everyone pass them, just as much as when the driver is going too much over the speed limit for the passengers comfort.

Maybe the term "back seat driver" syndrome encompasses the passenger feeling whether he/she is vocal or not.

Speed limits are mostly arbitrarily set anyways for a lot of roads anyways in a lot of circumstances.
Why is it 100 kph on a highway, and not 110 kph, or 90 kph? ( 65 mph, 70 or 55 mph )?
Going with the traffic flow, and that can involve speeding, can be more safe for all cars on the road, which is you, the cars ahead and the cars behind.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top