Naming Organic Compounds: IUPAC Naming

AI Thread Summary
The compound CH3CHBrCH2ClCH2 is debated between being named 3-bromo-1-chlorobutane or 2-bromo-4-chlorobutane, with the correct IUPAC naming convention emphasizing the lowest sum of locants and alphabetical order of substituents. The consensus leans towards 3-bromo-1-chlorobutane, as it assigns the lowest numbers to the functional groups. Additionally, there is a question regarding whether CH3OCH3 can form hydrogen bonds, which remains unresolved in the discussion. The importance of following IUPAC rules for proper naming is highlighted, emphasizing clarity in communication. Accurate nomenclature is essential for effective scientific discourse.
no name
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
IUPAC naming!

Hey folks,
I just wonder how would you name this compound
CH3CHBrCH2ClCH2
is it 3- Bromo -1- chloro butane
or 2- bromo 4- chloro butane
another question : does CH3OCH3 form a hydrogene bond or not?
Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show your work.

What do you think the answers are and why?
 
well actaually i did the work ... and i am confused between the answers that i wrote ... wut i did is numbered the carbon atoms ... well i can number them in two different ways ..one where i will get the bromo on the 2nd atom and the chloro on the forth atom , and the other way is to number them where the bromo on the 3rd atom and the chloro on the first .. my question is which of numbering is correct .. ?
 
?
?
 
If I remember correctly, The nomenclature in which the functional groups get the lowest sum is to be used. Also, you should follow alphabetical order while naming them.
I am not too sure on this, so if I can get conformation, it would be nice.
 
I don't know if its a bit late but think about it.

IUPAC names it in alpha order and to the lowest sum.

Your compound looks like this:
| | | |
-C-C-C-C-
| | | |
Br Cl

Which would you think it looks like? From my perspective, it looks 3-bromo-1-chlorobutane.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
13K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Back
Top