Natural units and electron mass

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the expression of physical constants, specifically the electron mass, in natural units where ##c=1## and ##\hbar=1##. Participants explore the implications of these unit choices and the conversion between different unit systems, including SI and natural units.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that in SI units, the electron mass is ##0.511 \text{MeV}/c^{2}## and suggests that in natural units, it simplifies to ##0.511\ \text{MeV}##.
  • Another participant questions the need for an explicit ##c## in the conversion factor, arguing that mass expressed in MeV already incorporates ##c=1##.
  • A participant emphasizes the need to convert MeV into natural units of length, noting that ##\frac{1 \text{MeV}}{\hbar c}## provides the conversion factor from ##\text{MeV}## to ##\text{cm}^{-1}##.
  • There is a correction regarding a calculation, where a participant clarifies that the correct conversion is ##\frac{0.511 \text{MeV}}{\hbar c} = 2.58 \times 10^{12} \text{cm}^{-1}##.
  • Another participant mentions that setting ##\hbar = c = 1## still leaves some arbitrary units and discusses the common use of this system in particle physics and cosmology.
  • One participant brings up the concept of Planck units and suggests that dealing with mass-energy typically requires normalizing the gravitational constant as well.
  • It is noted that different schemes may normalize the mass of the electron or other particles, which effectively alters the value of ##G## used in calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and implications of including ##c## in conversion factors, and there is no consensus on the best approach to expressing the electron mass in natural units. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on definitions and the arbitrary nature of units when transitioning between different systems, particularly in the context of natural units versus SI units.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
I am trying to express some physical constants in natural units of ##c=1## and ##\hbar=1##.

Let's start with the electron mass. In SI units, the electron mass is ##0.511 \text{MeV}/c^{2}##. I understand that in natural units, the electron mass is simply ##0.511\ \text{MeV}##. Now, is the electron mass given by ##\frac{\hbar c}{0.511 \text{MeV}} = 1.01 \times 10^{-21}\ \text{cm}##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice that expressing mass in MeV alreafy has c=1 factored in - so why would the conversion factor have an explicit c in it?
How often do you normally convert units by dividing by the quantity you are converting?
When you convert quantity x from unit a into unit b, wouldn't you just multiply it by a conversion factor?

Observations:
To convert MeV into natural units of length, you need to know how many natural length units there are in 1MeV.
In general - setting ##\hbar = c = 1## still leaves some arbitrary units.
A "centimeter" is not usually a natural unit.

See, for example, plank units.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units#Planck_units

It looks like the calculation you did just normalizes the electron rest mass and tells you how big the unit of length is, in terms of other systems of units, for the particular set of natural units chosen.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Notice that expressing mass in MeV alreafy has c=1 factored in - so why would the conversion factor have an explicit c in it?

The mass expressed in ##\text{MeV}## needs to be converted to ##\text{cm}^{-1}##. Now, ##\frac{\text{MeV}}{\hbar c}## has dimensions of length. Therefore, ##\frac{1 \text{MeV}}{\hbar c}## gives the conversion factor from ##\text{MeV}## to ##\text{cm}^{-1}## in SI units.

Simon Bridge said:
How often do you normally convert units by dividing by the quantity you are converting?
When you convert quantity x from unit a into unit b, wouldn't you just multiply it by a conversion factor?

There is a typo in my calculation. It is actually ##\frac{0.511 \text{MeV}}{\hbar c} = 2.58 \times 10^{12} \text{cm}^{-1}##.

Simon Bridge said:
In general - setting ##\hbar = c = 1## still leaves some arbitrary units.

It does, but this system of units is heavily used in particle physics and cosmology.
 
What do you think?
 
You seem to be thinking of plank units ... to deal with mass-energy you usually need to also normalize the gravitational constant.
Other schemes normalize the mass of the electron or some other particle commonly dealt with... which amounts to picking a different value for G.

If m is the electron mass, then ##(mc^2)/\hbar c## gives dimensions of [E]/[E.L] = L^-1 ... so that comes out right for you... just makes sure you express ##\hbar c## in units of MeV.cm
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K