Medical Nature vs. Nurture: The Role of Environment in Shaping Moral Behavior

  • Thread starter Thread starter venger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brain
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinctions between individuals who engage in unethical behaviors, such as stealing and cheating, and those who act ethically. It posits that ethical behavior is a clear indicator of goodness, while unethical actions, regardless of legal repercussions, signify evil. The conversation highlights the complexity of defining "righteous" individuals, noting that some of the worst crimes can be committed by those who appear morally upright. There is mention of research suggesting physical differences in the brains of criminals compared to non-criminals, although skepticism exists regarding the visibility of these differences. The role of environmental factors and upbringing in shaping behavior is emphasized, illustrated by the example of identical twins raised in contrasting circumstances. This underscores the idea that social situations significantly influence moral development and behavior.
venger
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Is there anything that can distinguish a person who likes to steal, cheat the government, etc from honest people in the way they behave or brain activity. Or is it free will to obsess? In general, what is the foundation of finding righteous and evil people?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
There is an easy way to tell. People who act ethically are good, and those who do not are evil, no matter if their acts are not prosecutable under law or forbidden by moral code. Be very careful in trying to define "righteous" people because the most unspeakable crimes are often committed by people hiding under a cloak of morality and religious probity.
 
I remember an article that discussed the physical differences between the brains of normal people and criminals.
I can not remember when or where I found the article but if you do a search on "brain abnormalities and criminals" you will get a lot of hits.
 
sas3 said:
I remember an article that discussed the physical differences between the brains of normal people and criminals.
I can not remember when or where I found the article but if you do a search on "brain abnormalities and criminals" you will get a lot of hits.

Good google suggestion. I tried it and came up with a pretty good read on the subject here:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=33EF147A-E7F2-99DF-3696EF69D814FCFF
November 29, 2006
The Violent Brain
Violent behavior never erupts from a single cause. Rather it appears to result from a complex web of related factors, some genetic and others environmental.
 
I wouldn’t believe so... Well not noticeably different. I don't think you would be able to see a physical difference in brain matter or brain shape due to actions that an individual has taken. Though because of drug use, or brain damage the shape of the brain may be different and this may result in lack of judgments/ideas.
 
a mind is shaped by circumstances.
if you are a good person who helps those less fortunate and lead a good life...
do not be too proud of that. Its mostly the social situations and environment that shapes you.

here is an example.
identical twins are split at birth. 1 goes to a loving, caring family which lives in a good neighborhood.
the other twin is brought up in a poor family with abuse both mentally and physically from his foster parents. he lives in a high crime area.

thinking like this you can easily picture 1 of them as a successfull person and the other a hardened criminal.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top