Necessary axioms to derive solution to QHO problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter snoopies622
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axioms Derive
snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
I'm wondering how one solves for the quantum harmonic oscillator using matrix methods exclusively. Given the Hamiltonian
\hat{H} = \frac {1}{2m} \hat {P}^2 + \frac {1}{2} m \omega ^2 \hat {X}^2
and commutator relation
[ \hat {X} , \hat {P} ] = i \hbar \hat {I}
is that enough for premises? To me it looks like two equations and three unknowns. Are any other assumptions — either classical or quantum — allowed? It is tempting to introduce
\hat {H} \psi = E \psi
but that is called the Schrödinger equation after all, so it seems like cheating.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you need the extra assumption that the Hamiltonian has at least 1 eigenvector in the Hilbert space in which you represent the operator algebra. This amounts to saying the Hamiltonian is essentially self-adjoint on a representation space of the X,P,H operator algebra.
 
Very interesting, thank you dextercioby.

edit: Oh wait, all three matrices have to be Hermitian, don't they? That's a restriction, too.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top