Need Help for solving probability problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter srinivas2828
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
srinivas2828
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am new to Probability and i was unable to understand how to find i found this problem in schaum discrete mathematics book.
p(a)=0.6 p(b)=0.3 p(a and b)=0.2 how to find
(a). A but not B occurs
(b).B but not A occurs
(c).A or B occurs
(d).neither A nor B occurs
any help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi srinivas2828! Welcome to PF! :wink:

Let's start with (a).

You have the probabilities of A B and AB,

and you want the probability of AB' (where ' means "not") …

so how can you combine A B and AB to give you AB' ? :smile:

(what must you subtract from A to give AB' ?)
 
Another way to do this: Draw two overlapping circles, representing "A" and "B". The overlap is "A and B". Since P(A)= 0.6 (Please don't write "a" and "A" to mean the same thing!) the "size" of set A is .6. Since P(A and B)= 0.2 the "size" of the overlap is 0.2. What does that leave for the part of A and that is NOT in B (A and not B)?
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top