Need help learning to construct proofs

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proofs
AI Thread Summary
Constructing proofs is a significant focus in upper-level math courses, particularly in Theory of Linear Algebra, where understanding theorems is essential. To start writing proofs, it's important to familiarize oneself with theorems and definitions, as they provide a foundation for constructing arguments. Resources like "Problem Solving" by C. Larson can be helpful, as they outline methods for approaching proofs, including looking for counterexamples and using induction. A practical approach involves rearranging problems by applying learned theorems step-by-step. With practice, one can streamline the proof process by relying on familiar techniques and theorems.
quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
so, I am in my first upper level math course beyond required calculus and the introductory linear algebra class. I don't know if it's just a great jump or if I slept through something, but suddenly everything is all about doing proofs. I'm okay with that, and I think it's fabulous because proofs seem to yield deeper conceptual understanding, but I have no experience whatsoever with writing/constructing proofs. I can memorize axioms and whatnot, but then how do I get started? anyone have any good texts on proof writing or know of any resources that could help me? I'm clueless here!

I don't know if it makes a difference (with regards to what kind of proof I should study) but the class is Theory of Linear Algebra. I love the topic, just have no idea how to prove things for every case... :blushing:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
yes there is a good book called Problem Solving by "C" Larson. Not sure if the C is the write letter.

the main way that I learned how to do proofs was to cram allt he theorems on one page. granted that you actually have to understand these theorems.

The straight forward method is to just rearrange your problem by regurgitating each step via one the theorems that you have learned up till that point.

Larson's Book outlines steps you should take to rearranging a given problem in such as looking for a counterexample(contradiction), recursion(can't remember the proper term...oh induction), look for symmetry and parity.

At the beginning of it all though try to define your problem based on all the previous defintions that you have learned.

...onc eyou become more accustomed to knowing some theorems and techniques then you can skip the majority of steps.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top