Need help studying for upper level physics quals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics_UG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Studying
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced by a PhD student preparing for their qualifying exam, particularly the difficulty in solving practice problems due to a lack of foundational knowledge in classical mechanics, electromagnetism (E+M), and statistical mechanics/thermal physics. Recommendations emphasize the importance of revisiting undergraduate textbooks that the student previously sold, as familiarity with these texts can significantly aid in preparation. Suggestions for specific textbooks include Marion and Thornton for mechanics, Reif or Kittel for statistical mechanics, and Marion and Heald for electromagnetism. Additionally, it is highlighted that solving problems is crucial for preparation, and utilizing university library resources can be beneficial to avoid repurchasing all textbooks. Understanding the expectations of the specific graduate program is also advised for tailored preparation.
Physics_UG
Gold Member
Messages
287
Reaction score
2
So I am studying for my phd program's qualifying exam and I find that I can solve hardly any of the practice exams from the last 10 years (not able to do any of the problems). I clearly am lacking the basics. Can someone recommend some books to study to get an undergraduate physics level understanding of upper level classical mechanics, E+M, and stat mech/thermal physics? I already own Griffith's quantum mechanics book. All my other textbooks I sold back to the bookstore.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics_UG said:
All my other textbooks I sold back to the bookstore.

As you have discovered, that was a mistake. I would buy another copy of those texts and start from there.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
As you have discovered, that was a mistake. I would buy another copy of those texts and start from there.

Some of them I kept but we moved to a new house and I don't know what happened to the other ones. :(

I am not sure the texts I used in undergrad are good ones.
 
It doesn't matter if the mistake was that you sold them to the bookstore, or that you otherwise lost them. What matters is that you no longer have them. You spent months of your life working through each book, so you should get another copy. You might also want to get some other book, but the ones you need most are the ones you are most familiar with.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
It doesn't matter if the mistake was that you sold them to the bookstore, or that you otherwise lost them. What matters is that you no longer have them. You spent months of your life working through each book, so you should get another copy. You might also want to get some other book, but the ones you need most are the ones you are most familiar with.

I see. Thanks Vanadium.
 
If you have some idea of the graduate school, you can see what preparation they expect for the qualifier. Graduateschoolshopper has files for graduate schools and the academic preparation they expect. Most importantly, I learned to do problem after problem. Reading background is sometimes necessary, but it is solving the problems that is the best preparation. If you have a university library nearby, it may not be necessary to buy back all your recommended books.

possibilities:
Upper level Mechanics: Marion and Thornton Mech of particles and systems?, or Symon Mechanics,
Upper level Stat Mech: Reif, perhaps Kittel Thermal physic, Sears and Salinger, or Zemansky
Upper level EM: Marion and Heald, Corson and Lorraine, Griffith,
Upper level QM: Griffith, Gasiorowicz, Eisberg and Resnick maybe, Liboff, Saxon?

but is best to consider the graduate school you expect to attend to be more specific.
 
Hi all, Hope you are doing well. I'm a current grad student in applied geophysics and will finish my PhD in about 2 years (previously did a HBSc in Physics, did research in exp. quantum optics). I chose my current field because of its practicality and its clear connection to industry, not out of passion (a clear mistake). I notice that a lot of people (colleagues) switch to different subfields of physics once they graduate and enter post docs. But 95% of these cases fall into either of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K