Need Help Understanding a Quantum Mechanics Equation

Bootsie
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Can anyone please help me understand this equation and explain it to me?


0a1c02498125a255a2f5b0e58908a8ae.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That says that you can measure the position of an object as accurately as you please (\Delta x is the "error" in measuring the position) or you can measure the momentum as accurately as you please (\Delta p is the "error" in measuring momentum) but you cannot measure both any more accurately than given by that equation.
 
Bootsie said:
Can anyone please help me understand this equation and explain it to me?
0a1c02498125a255a2f5b0e58908a8ae.png

Bootsie, welcome to PF!

The equation you have there is the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. The term Δx refers to the uncertainty on the part of an observer on a particle's positions, and Δp refers to the observers uncertainty about a particle's momentum.

Essentially, the equation says that the more definite a particle's position, the less you can know about it's momentum - and vice versa. It can be generalized to any attributes of a particle, the HUP essentially states that a particle can never have definite properties.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

EDIT: Looks like HallsofIvy beat me to it.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
244
Replies
2
Views
788
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
945
Replies
2
Views
893
Back
Top