A Need help understanding Lambda Twist method for camera localization?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Huyanyinglei
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
Huyanyinglei
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Lambda Twist is one of the state-of-the-art methods of P-n-P problem.
I have the following problem. P-n-p problem is often referred to when talking about camera localization(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perspective-n-Point). It’s a mathematical problem also a computer science problem. Lambda Twist is one of the state-of-the-art methods(http://openaccess.thecvf.com/conten...l_Persson_Lambda_Twist_An_ECCV_2018_paper.pdf). May I ask if there’s some good articles that can help me understand Lambda Twist method? It’s a little bit hard for me and now I'm stuck with this problem.
Any ideas? Thanx in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm sure you have searched the web for it. If it is also state of the art as you said, then it's likely that anyone can't do any better than this. Also we don't know where you're stuck and why. I find the Wikipedia article quite elaborated.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top