Need help with 2 advanced stat questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter NYCStats22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    advanced
NYCStats22
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Really need help with these two questions. I have been working on them for some time and just can't seem to make any significant progress


1) X is a continuous random variable with density function

f(x) = (θ + 1)x^θ , 0 < x < 1 and 0 elsewhere

Derive both the method of moments estimator and the maximum likelihood estimator for λ.

*For the MOM estimator you will need to find the mean*


2) Two surgical procedures are compares and what is of interest are the complication rates. 150 patients had procedure A and there were 35 complications while procedure B tested 138 patients and there were 34 complications. Does this indicate a difference at a 1% level. What is the P-value?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have been working on them for some time
Please show your work then.
In addition, do you know the definitions of the things you have to calculate? Do you know formulas for them?
 
You don't have enough information to find the estimators for \lambda. Perhaps you should try for the
appropriate estimators of \theta.

Do you know how, in principle, to find a method of moments estimator? Same for the MLE. If so, set things up and work as far as possible, then organize your questions about what you have and what you need to do.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top