Need help with equilibrium equations - Please

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaronfue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the equilibrium constant Kc for the reaction 4NOBr (g) ⇌ 4NO (g) + 2Br2 (g) using the provided reaction 2NO(g) + Br2 (g) ⇌ 2NOBr (g) with K = 2.0. The user expresses confusion about how to manipulate the given equilibrium constant to find Kc for the desired reaction. It is clarified that reversing the second equation and adjusting the equilibrium constant accordingly is necessary, specifically using the relation Kc = (1/K)^2. The user acknowledges the importance of understanding the conventions for expressing equilibrium constants. This discussion highlights the process of deriving Kc from known equilibrium constants in chemical reactions.
aaronfue
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
Need help with equilibrium equations -- ASAP Please

Homework Statement



I'm studying for a final that I'm taking tomorrow and am stuck on the following:

Calculate Kc for the reaction:

4NOBr (g) \Leftrightarrow 4NO (g) + 2Br2 (g)

given the following information:

2NO(g) + Br2 (g) \Leftrightarrow 2NOBr (g); K = 2.0

Homework Equations



Not sure about which equations other than Kc = \frac{[products]}{[reactions]}

The Attempt at a Solution



I can't even start this answer. My first assumption of where to start was to write the second equation backwards, just so it looked like the first!??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
K_c=(1/K)^2
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top