Need Help with Newton's equation and circular motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the linear independence of the vectors t(t) and n(t) in the context of circular motion. It is established that the dot product being zero indicates orthogonality, which implies linear independence, but a more formal proof is suggested. The second point raises confusion about demonstrating that angular velocity ω is a real number, with no clear method provided in the original context. The third point questions whether all angular velocities can indicate a circular orbit, highlighting the need for additional clarification on the equations involved. Overall, the thread seeks assistance in understanding these concepts and proofs related to Newton's equations and circular motion.
JPTM
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1. Proof that the vectors \vec{t}(t) = cos(ω(t)), sin(ω(t)) and \vec{n}(t) = -sin(ω(t)), cos(ω(t)) are linearly independant

2. Proof that ω = ω\in\mathbb R

3. Can all angular velocities indicate a possible circular orbit? If so, proof it, if not which angular velocities do?

-ω is the angular velocity
-The movement starts at (r,0)
-We don't use r = 0

Homework Equations



We have 3 given equations:

F(t) = μ\vec{r''}(t) = - \dfrac{k}{(r(t))^3}\vec{r}(t)

Which can be rewritten as:

\vec{r''}(t) = \dfrac{f(r(t))}{μr(t)}\vec{r}(t)

Also the equation of our circular motion is:

\vec{r}(t) = r(cos(ω(t)), sin(ω(t)))

The Attempt at a Solution



1. Can simply be proven by calculating the dot product of t(t) and n(t) which = 0 which means that they have to be linearly independant

2. This is the one I'm stuck at, I've never had any exercise or read something about how you could proof that something is a real number

3. I think I need 2. for this one

Help would be grately appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With order...

Pay attention that in point 1) you are simply proving, showing that the dot product is zero, that the vectors are perpendicular. You have to prove that they are linearly independent though, which I don't think in general is the same thing. Use the definition of linearly independent vectors and show that indeed the combination ##a\vec{t}+b\vec{n}=0## if and only if ##a## and ##b## are both zero (it is easily done). If it happens then indeed they will be linearly independent.

As for point 2), I do not understand what is the meaning of such a question. In general the argument of a sine or cosine is real, so you should have some condition to satisfy for this not to happen. And I also do not understand the meaning of the third question as well... could you give some more information about this?? Also perhaps specifying what the equations you have are??
 
Orthogonality always implies linear independence, so I think the proof of #1 is OK.

The other questions are indeed puzzling.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top